(07-16-2015, 06:55 PM)MT link Wrote:(Sorry for replying to an older post, but the topic is active and I don't think any responded to Garvin's point directly.)
[quote author=garvin link=topic=11153.msg121261#msg121261 date=1435159970]
I cannot conceive of the admissions staff sitting around saying, well, Jane Smith's application would be good enough if she just wanted to come here and major in physics, but she's not academically sound enough to play basketball.
I
can imagine Tara requiring a higher standard than the "average" Stanford requirements. She may feel that the load of playing on the WBB team and being a Stanford student may be too much for an "average" Stanford student. She may require that if she is going to give out one a few precious scholarships to an as-yet-unproven student, she wants to feel confident that the student will handle the combined load. She might even feel that academics comes first and she doesn't want to ever have to have to tell a scholarship player to cut her commitment to BB in order to improve her education at Stanford.
So, for Tara, she may happy to have a walk-on that is average among the elite students at Stanford, but she may not have been willing to give a scholarship to that person. I'd think most really good prospects would choose another school that would give them a scholarship.
I don't mean to say that WBB is more demanding than any other sport or extracurricular activity, just that it does add to the load on a student. Football, because of its greater number of scholarships, may have more scholarship room for a few students that don't make the combined load. It would be interesting to know if other coaches (any sport) at Stanford or elsewhere also restrict their scholarships to prospective students whose academics are above the school's normal requirements.
(Yes, a prospect's academic record at high school was while participating in athletics. But the time spent on the sport in college is usually greater than it was during high school.)
[/quote]
Those are interesting points you bring up. Too bad there's not hard data or anecdotal evidence to prove one way or another the differences between the various sports at Stanford, since there are other sports where we do get pretty good recruiting classes on a consistent basis.