09-18-2015, 04:16 PM
Sacks an area where
09-18-2015, 04:28 PM
Gotdamn enough with the stats this is SC we have to skull ---- those guys, on both sides of the ball!
We do that we win.
Jesus go have a drink. This isn't baseball for Christsakes.
We do that we win.
Jesus go have a drink. This isn't baseball for Christsakes.
09-18-2015, 04:30 PM
IIRC we had two sacks in two games, both in the second half of the UCF game.
One thing that may help is USC is vulnerable to sacks. Against two weak opponents, they have given up 5 sacks in 74 attempts + sacks (a sack rate of 6.3%). In contrast we've given up 3 in 68 chances, a rate of 4.4%.
Surprised Oregon is so low.
BC
One thing that may help is USC is vulnerable to sacks. Against two weak opponents, they have given up 5 sacks in 74 attempts + sacks (a sack rate of 6.3%). In contrast we've given up 3 in 68 chances, a rate of 4.4%.
Surprised Oregon is so low.
BC
IIRC we had two sacks in two games, both in the second half of the UCF game.
One thing that may help is USC is vulnerable to sacks. Against two weak opponents, they have given up 5 sacks in 74 attempts + sacks (a sack rate of 6.3%). In contrast we've given up 3 in 68 chances, a rate of 4.4%.
Surprised Oregon is so low.
BC
One thing that may help is USC is vulnerable to sacks. Against two weak opponents, they have given up 5 sacks in 74 attempts + sacks (a sack rate of 6.3%). In contrast we've given up 3 in 68 chances, a rate of 4.4%.
Surprised Oregon is so low.
BC
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »