Sacks an area where - Printable Version
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Sacks an area where (/thread-9888.html)
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Sacks an area where (/thread-9888.html)
Sacks an area where - washingtonismoney - 09-18-2015
Both Stanford and SC have been weak so far:
https://twitter.com/bonaguraespn/status/644948393249255426
Re: Sacks an area where - oman - 09-18-2015
Gotdamn enough with the stats this is SC we have to skull ---- those guys, on both sides of the ball!
We do that we win.
Jesus go have a drink. This isn't baseball for Christsakes.
Re: Sacks an area where - BostonCard - 09-18-2015
IIRC we had two sacks in two games, both in the second half of the UCF game.
One thing that may help is USC is vulnerable to sacks. Against two weak opponents, they have given up 5 sacks in 74 attempts + sacks (a sack rate of 6.3%). In contrast we've given up 3 in 68 chances, a rate of 4.4%.
Surprised Oregon is so low.
BC
Re: Sacks an area where - oman - 09-18-2015
And I would never say "jeepers".