11-25-2016, 07:52 PM
maxpreps has Mills with 5 TD throws and 1 rushing TD. I didn't see any INTs in its "play by play."
yes, not a bad night.
yes, not a bad night.
Class of 2017
11-25-2016, 08:01 PM
How is it that the #1 and 2 seeds played in the quarterfinals? #pairingsfail
"We have an unwritten rule around here not to do anything stupid."
-Casey Jacobsen, Feb 3, 2000
How is it that the #1 and 2 seeds played in the quarterfinals? #pairingsfail
"We have an unwritten rule around here not to do anything stupid."
-Casey Jacobsen, Feb 3, 2000
11-25-2016, 08:38 PM
(11-25-2016, 05:35 PM)JPRI link Wrote:[quote author=DC 86 link=topic=11701.msg180554#msg180554 date=1480111418]
As a HS senior, Jake Browning threw for 91 TD and 7 interceptions.
Obviously the range of high school competition is extremely wide, which combined with whether coaches elect to pad numbers in lopsided games renders statistical comparisons as almost meaningless.
Browning is clearly an outlier. Does that necessarily lead to the conclusion that statistical comparisons are meaningless? Not sure it does.
[/quote]
I did say "almost meaningless", not "meaningless".
Browning is not an outlier at all. This season is not even over and there are players such as Nick Gerber (73 TD / 4 Int), Alex Huston (76/12), JT Daniels (63/2), Grant Gunnell (63/9) and many others with video game numbers. A few are top recruits; the vast majority are not.
Perhaps it's better to say that high school statistics are almost meaningless absent major adjustments based on state, division, team strength, etc.
(11-25-2016, 05:35 PM)JPRI link Wrote:[quote author=DC 86 link=topic=11701.msg180554#msg180554 date=1480111418]
As a HS senior, Jake Browning threw for 91 TD and 7 interceptions.
Obviously the range of high school competition is extremely wide, which combined with whether coaches elect to pad numbers in lopsided games renders statistical comparisons as almost meaningless.
Browning is clearly an outlier. Does that necessarily lead to the conclusion that statistical comparisons are meaningless? Not sure it does.
[/quote]
I did say "almost meaningless", not "meaningless".
Browning is not an outlier at all. This season is not even over and there are players such as Nick Gerber (73 TD / 4 Int), Alex Huston (76/12), JT Daniels (63/2), Grant Gunnell (63/9) and many others with video game numbers. A few are top recruits; the vast majority are not.
Perhaps it's better to say that high school statistics are almost meaningless absent major adjustments based on state, division, team strength, etc.
11-26-2016, 04:28 AM
(This post was last modified: 11-26-2016, 04:34 AM by AthleticsDynasty.)
(11-25-2016, 08:38 PM)DC 86 link Wrote:[quote author=JPRI link=topic=11701.msg180579#msg180579 date=1480120522]
[quote author=DC 86 link=topic=11701.msg180554#msg180554 date=1480111418]
As a HS senior, Jake Browning threw for 91 TD and 7 interceptions.
Obviously the range of high school competition is extremely wide, which combined with whether coaches elect to pad numbers in lopsided games renders statistical comparisons as almost meaningless.
Browning is clearly an outlier. Does that necessarily lead to the conclusion that statistical comparisons are meaningless? Not sure it does.
[/quote]
I did say "almost meaningless", not "meaningless".
Browning is not an outlier at all. This season is not even over and there are players such as Nick Gerber (73 TD / 4 Int), Alex Huston (76/12), JT Daniels (63/2), Grant Gunnell (63/9) and many others with video game numbers. A few are top recruits; the vast majority are not.
Perhaps it's better to say that high school statistics are almost meaningless absent major adjustments based on state, division, team strength, etc.
[/quote]
None of those players have numbers like Browning.
The truth is stats absolutely matter they just need to weighted against the level of competition and the level of supporting cast(relative to the competition). The same context you would give stats in college or NFL apply to HS it just takes more work.
For example the QB committed to Clemson who most sites have ranked ahead of Mills has inferior numbers, plays worse comp and with better teammates(relative to the comp). Its a pretty good indicator who's better
(This post was last modified: 11-26-2016, 04:34 AM by AthleticsDynasty.)
(11-25-2016, 08:38 PM)DC 86 link Wrote:[quote author=JPRI link=topic=11701.msg180579#msg180579 date=1480120522]
[quote author=DC 86 link=topic=11701.msg180554#msg180554 date=1480111418]
As a HS senior, Jake Browning threw for 91 TD and 7 interceptions.
Obviously the range of high school competition is extremely wide, which combined with whether coaches elect to pad numbers in lopsided games renders statistical comparisons as almost meaningless.
Browning is clearly an outlier. Does that necessarily lead to the conclusion that statistical comparisons are meaningless? Not sure it does.
[/quote]
I did say "almost meaningless", not "meaningless".
Browning is not an outlier at all. This season is not even over and there are players such as Nick Gerber (73 TD / 4 Int), Alex Huston (76/12), JT Daniels (63/2), Grant Gunnell (63/9) and many others with video game numbers. A few are top recruits; the vast majority are not.
Perhaps it's better to say that high school statistics are almost meaningless absent major adjustments based on state, division, team strength, etc.
[/quote]
None of those players have numbers like Browning.
The truth is stats absolutely matter they just need to weighted against the level of competition and the level of supporting cast(relative to the competition). The same context you would give stats in college or NFL apply to HS it just takes more work.
For example the QB committed to Clemson who most sites have ranked ahead of Mills has inferior numbers, plays worse comp and with better teammates(relative to the comp). Its a pretty good indicator who's better
11-26-2016, 05:05 AM
(11-26-2016, 04:28 AM)AthleticsDynasty link Wrote:[quote author=DC 86 link=topic=11701.msg180601#msg180601 date=1480131525]
[quote author=JPRI link=topic=11701.msg180579#msg180579 date=1480120522]
[quote author=DC 86 link=topic=11701.msg180554#msg180554 date=1480111418]
As a HS senior, Jake Browning threw for 91 TD and 7 interceptions.
Obviously the range of high school competition is extremely wide, which combined with whether coaches elect to pad numbers in lopsided games renders statistical comparisons as almost meaningless.
Browning is clearly an outlier. Does that necessarily lead to the conclusion that statistical comparisons are meaningless? Not sure it does.
[/quote]
I did say "almost meaningless", not "meaningless".
Browning is not an outlier at all. This season is not even over and there are players such as Nick Gerber (73 TD / 4 Int), Alex Huston (76/12), JT Daniels (63/2), Grant Gunnell (63/9) and many others with video game numbers. A few are top recruits; the vast majority are not.
Perhaps it's better to say that high school statistics are almost meaningless absent major adjustments based on state, division, team strength, etc.
[/quote]
None of those players have numbers like Browning.
The truth is stats absolutely matter they just need to weighted against the level of competition and the level of supporting cast(relative to the competition). The same context you would give stats in college or NFL apply to HS it just takes more work.
For example the QB committed to Clemson who most sites have ranked ahead of Mills has inferior numbers, plays worse comp and with better teammates(relative to the comp). Its a pretty good indicator who's better
[/quote]
Hunter Johnson (now committed to Clempson, previously committed to Tennessee)?
he camped with Stanford. I recall Andy Druk's reports, and Andy was high on him. no offer though.
(11-26-2016, 04:28 AM)AthleticsDynasty link Wrote:[quote author=DC 86 link=topic=11701.msg180601#msg180601 date=1480131525]
[quote author=JPRI link=topic=11701.msg180579#msg180579 date=1480120522]
[quote author=DC 86 link=topic=11701.msg180554#msg180554 date=1480111418]
As a HS senior, Jake Browning threw for 91 TD and 7 interceptions.
Obviously the range of high school competition is extremely wide, which combined with whether coaches elect to pad numbers in lopsided games renders statistical comparisons as almost meaningless.
Browning is clearly an outlier. Does that necessarily lead to the conclusion that statistical comparisons are meaningless? Not sure it does.
[/quote]
I did say "almost meaningless", not "meaningless".
Browning is not an outlier at all. This season is not even over and there are players such as Nick Gerber (73 TD / 4 Int), Alex Huston (76/12), JT Daniels (63/2), Grant Gunnell (63/9) and many others with video game numbers. A few are top recruits; the vast majority are not.
Perhaps it's better to say that high school statistics are almost meaningless absent major adjustments based on state, division, team strength, etc.
[/quote]
None of those players have numbers like Browning.
The truth is stats absolutely matter they just need to weighted against the level of competition and the level of supporting cast(relative to the competition). The same context you would give stats in college or NFL apply to HS it just takes more work.
For example the QB committed to Clemson who most sites have ranked ahead of Mills has inferior numbers, plays worse comp and with better teammates(relative to the comp). Its a pretty good indicator who's better
[/quote]
Hunter Johnson (now committed to Clempson, previously committed to Tennessee)?
he camped with Stanford. I recall Andy Druk's reports, and Andy was high on him. no offer though.
11-26-2016, 08:02 AM
(11-26-2016, 04:28 AM)AthleticsDynasty link Wrote:[quote author=DC 86 link=topic=11701.msg180601#msg180601 date=1480131525]
[quote author=JPRI link=topic=11701.msg180579#msg180579 date=1480120522]
[quote author=DC 86 link=topic=11701.msg180554#msg180554 date=1480111418]
As a HS senior, Jake Browning threw for 91 TD and 7 interceptions.
Obviously the range of high school competition is extremely wide, which combined with whether coaches elect to pad numbers in lopsided games renders statistical comparisons as almost meaningless.
Browning is clearly an outlier. Does that necessarily lead to the conclusion that statistical comparisons are meaningless? Not sure it does.
[/quote]
I did say "almost meaningless", not "meaningless".
Browning is not an outlier at all. This season is not even over and there are players such as Nick Gerber (73 TD / 4 Int), Alex Huston (76/12), JT Daniels (63/2), Grant Gunnell (63/9) and many others with video game numbers. A few are top recruits; the vast majority are not.
Perhaps it's better to say that high school statistics are almost meaningless absent major adjustments based on state, division, team strength, etc.
[/quote]
None of those players have numbers like Browning.
The truth is stats absolutely matter they just need to weighted against the level of competition and the level of supporting cast(relative to the competition). The same context you would give stats in college or NFL apply to HS it just takes more work.
For example the QB committed to Clemson who most sites have ranked ahead of Mills has inferior numbers, plays worse comp and with better teammates(relative to the comp). Its a pretty good indicator who's better
[/quote]
Gerber has 73 TD and 4 interceptions with games remaining this season, can't say that none has numbers similar to Browning.
We are saying the same thing about the need for context, but high school requires a dramatically larger adjustment as compared to college or NFL obviously, to the point where evaluators don't put much weight on raw numbers.
Hunter Johnson's case (and the other top QB recruits this season) proves my point; college recruiters are not driven by raw numbers in making their evaluations.
(11-26-2016, 04:28 AM)AthleticsDynasty link Wrote:[quote author=DC 86 link=topic=11701.msg180601#msg180601 date=1480131525]
[quote author=JPRI link=topic=11701.msg180579#msg180579 date=1480120522]
[quote author=DC 86 link=topic=11701.msg180554#msg180554 date=1480111418]
As a HS senior, Jake Browning threw for 91 TD and 7 interceptions.
Obviously the range of high school competition is extremely wide, which combined with whether coaches elect to pad numbers in lopsided games renders statistical comparisons as almost meaningless.
Browning is clearly an outlier. Does that necessarily lead to the conclusion that statistical comparisons are meaningless? Not sure it does.
[/quote]
I did say "almost meaningless", not "meaningless".
Browning is not an outlier at all. This season is not even over and there are players such as Nick Gerber (73 TD / 4 Int), Alex Huston (76/12), JT Daniels (63/2), Grant Gunnell (63/9) and many others with video game numbers. A few are top recruits; the vast majority are not.
Perhaps it's better to say that high school statistics are almost meaningless absent major adjustments based on state, division, team strength, etc.
[/quote]
None of those players have numbers like Browning.
The truth is stats absolutely matter they just need to weighted against the level of competition and the level of supporting cast(relative to the competition). The same context you would give stats in college or NFL apply to HS it just takes more work.
For example the QB committed to Clemson who most sites have ranked ahead of Mills has inferior numbers, plays worse comp and with better teammates(relative to the comp). Its a pretty good indicator who's better
[/quote]
Gerber has 73 TD and 4 interceptions with games remaining this season, can't say that none has numbers similar to Browning.
We are saying the same thing about the need for context, but high school requires a dramatically larger adjustment as compared to college or NFL obviously, to the point where evaluators don't put much weight on raw numbers.
Hunter Johnson's case (and the other top QB recruits this season) proves my point; college recruiters are not driven by raw numbers in making their evaluations.
11-26-2016, 09:03 AM
Daniel is high on Stanford and we on him.  He will visit Stanford after his season. Just a Soph
11-29-2016, 02:40 PM
Anyone want to provide an update on the outlook for the 2017 class?Â
I feel a lot less informed about where things are at and who the potential candidates might be than I was last year at this time. Sure, the class looks like it will be on the small side, and there have been a few blurbs about specific recruits, but it just doesn't seem there has been as much big picture discussion about the class as usual.
Has recruiting momentum slowed down? Are the top targets still in play? I have always held out some hope that Jaelen Phillips might flip to Stanford from UCLA (maybe the 4-8 flameout of a season helps that cause), but I have really no sense of the chances of that now.
I feel a lot less informed about where things are at and who the potential candidates might be than I was last year at this time. Sure, the class looks like it will be on the small side, and there have been a few blurbs about specific recruits, but it just doesn't seem there has been as much big picture discussion about the class as usual.
Has recruiting momentum slowed down? Are the top targets still in play? I have always held out some hope that Jaelen Phillips might flip to Stanford from UCLA (maybe the 4-8 flameout of a season helps that cause), but I have really no sense of the chances of that now.
Anyone want to provide an update on the outlook for the 2017 class?Â
I feel a lot less informed about where things are at and who the potential candidates might be than I was last year at this time. Sure, the class looks like it will be on the small side, and there have been a few blurbs about specific recruits, but it just doesn't seem there has been as much big picture discussion about the class as usual.
Has recruiting momentum slowed down? Are the top targets still in play? I have always held out some hope that Jaelen Phillips might flip to Stanford from UCLA (maybe the 4-8 flameout of a season helps that cause), but I have really no sense of the chances of that now.
I feel a lot less informed about where things are at and who the potential candidates might be than I was last year at this time. Sure, the class looks like it will be on the small side, and there have been a few blurbs about specific recruits, but it just doesn't seem there has been as much big picture discussion about the class as usual.
Has recruiting momentum slowed down? Are the top targets still in play? I have always held out some hope that Jaelen Phillips might flip to Stanford from UCLA (maybe the 4-8 flameout of a season helps that cause), but I have really no sense of the chances of that now.
11-29-2016, 06:55 PM
Well sadly you're asked for premium content
The coaches are out recruiting this week
The coaches are out recruiting this week
11-29-2016, 10:46 PM
Coaches paid a visit to Walker Little: https://twitter.com/slittleiam/status/80...6858390528
11-30-2016, 01:48 PM
Stanford leads for DT Dalyn Wade-Perry: https://twitter.com/StanfordFB/status/80...7807350784
11-30-2016, 03:19 PM
Who is Werner? (the one who de-committed from ND)
DIE LUFT DER FREIHEIT WEHT
Who is Werner? (the one who de-committed from ND)
DIE LUFT DER FREIHEIT WEHT
12-01-2016, 07:50 AM
Stanford not giving up on Jealan Phillips:
http://www.cbssports.com/college-footbal...ar-commit/
Of course, as usual, the reporter doesn't indicate if he has filled out a Stanford application, the only thing that really matters at this point.
http://www.cbssports.com/college-footbal...ar-commit/
Of course, as usual, the reporter doesn't indicate if he has filled out a Stanford application, the only thing that really matters at this point.
Stanford not giving up on Jealan Phillips:
http://www.cbssports.com/college-footbal...ar-commit/
Of course, as usual, the reporter doesn't indicate if he has filled out a Stanford application, the only thing that really matters at this point.
http://www.cbssports.com/college-footbal...ar-commit/
Of course, as usual, the reporter doesn't indicate if he has filled out a Stanford application, the only thing that really matters at this point.
12-01-2016, 09:37 AM
I'm sure Shaw is heading up to the Seattle area to talk to Foster Sarell. Hope he is convincing. I think early playing time could be a good selling point in our favor.
I'm sure Shaw is heading up to the Seattle area to talk to Foster Sarell. Hope he is convincing. I think early playing time could be a good selling point in our favor.
12-01-2016, 09:40 AM
(12-01-2016, 07:50 AM)OutsiderFan link Wrote:Stanford not giving up on Jealan Phillips:
http://www.cbssports.com/college-footbal...ar-commit/
Of course, as usual, the reporter doesn't indicate if he has filled out a Stanford application, the only thing that really matters at this point.
This article notes his family ties to UCLA.Â
http://www.recruitingnewsguru.com/ucla-2...ecruiting/
Also notes a GPA of 4.36.
Geaux Cardinal!
(12-01-2016, 07:50 AM)OutsiderFan link Wrote:Stanford not giving up on Jealan Phillips:
http://www.cbssports.com/college-footbal...ar-commit/
Of course, as usual, the reporter doesn't indicate if he has filled out a Stanford application, the only thing that really matters at this point.
This article notes his family ties to UCLA.Â
http://www.recruitingnewsguru.com/ucla-2...ecruiting/
Also notes a GPA of 4.36.
Geaux Cardinal!
12-01-2016, 10:11 AM
(12-01-2016, 09:40 AM)BigEasyCard link Wrote:[quote author=OutsiderFan link=topic=11701.msg181301#msg181301 date=1480603832]
Stanford not giving up on Jealan Phillips:
http://www.cbssports.com/college-footbal...ar-commit/
Of course, as usual, the reporter doesn't indicate if he has filled out a Stanford application, the only thing that really matters at this point.
This article notes his family ties to UCLA.Â
http://www.recruitingnewsguru.com/ucla-2...ecruiting/
Also notes a GPA of 4.36.
Geaux Cardinal!
[/quote]
Yeah, I think he chose UCLA over Stanford because of family ties. So UCLA's lousy season probably hasn't affected his decision.
(12-01-2016, 09:40 AM)BigEasyCard link Wrote:[quote author=OutsiderFan link=topic=11701.msg181301#msg181301 date=1480603832]
Stanford not giving up on Jealan Phillips:
http://www.cbssports.com/college-footbal...ar-commit/
Of course, as usual, the reporter doesn't indicate if he has filled out a Stanford application, the only thing that really matters at this point.
This article notes his family ties to UCLA.Â
http://www.recruitingnewsguru.com/ucla-2...ecruiting/
Also notes a GPA of 4.36.
Geaux Cardinal!
[/quote]
Yeah, I think he chose UCLA over Stanford because of family ties. So UCLA's lousy season probably hasn't affected his decision.
12-02-2016, 06:59 AM
(12-02-2016, 02:53 AM)JPRI link Wrote:Sounds like a good prospect.
https://stanford.rivals.com/news/tuliaup...m-stanford
Gotta like his enthusiasm for Stanford. Hopefully he qualifies.
This should be in the Class of 2018 thread perhaps?
(12-02-2016, 02:53 AM)JPRI link Wrote:Sounds like a good prospect.
https://stanford.rivals.com/news/tuliaup...m-stanford
Gotta like his enthusiasm for Stanford. Hopefully he qualifies.
This should be in the Class of 2018 thread perhaps?
12-03-2016, 08:07 AM
Mills marches on to the Georgia state finals: http://www.gwinnettprepsports.com/school...5d0d8.html
Sounds like he had an OK game by his standards though.
Sounds like he had an OK game by his standards though.
Mills marches on to the Georgia state finals: http://www.gwinnettprepsports.com/school...5d0d8.html
Sounds like he had an OK game by his standards though.
Sounds like he had an OK game by his standards though.
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »