09-17-2016, 09:06 PM
Class of 2017
09-17-2016, 09:17 PM
I wonder if that drive where we simply had McCaffrey, Burns, and Marx in the backfield and 8 linemen (OK, maybe one or two was a tight end) impressed Little and Sarell?
If you are an offensive line recruit, today had to leave you licking your chops.
BC
If you are an offensive line recruit, today had to leave you licking your chops.
BC
I wonder if that drive where we simply had McCaffrey, Burns, and Marx in the backfield and 8 linemen (OK, maybe one or two was a tight end) impressed Little and Sarell?
If you are an offensive line recruit, today had to leave you licking your chops.
BC
If you are an offensive line recruit, today had to leave you licking your chops.
BC
09-18-2016, 06:10 AM
(09-17-2016, 09:17 PM)Boston Card link Wrote:I wonder if that drive where we simply had McCaffrey, Burns, and Marx in the backfield and 8 linemen (OK, maybe one or two was a tight end) impressed Little and Sarell?
If you are an offensive line recruit, today had to leave you licking your chops.
BC
Should have been a pretty good night for recruiting Sarrell and Little. We won impressively, and Notre Dame and Texas, two of our competitors for them lost.
Anyone know who the other three guys in the picture are?
(09-17-2016, 09:17 PM)Boston Card link Wrote:I wonder if that drive where we simply had McCaffrey, Burns, and Marx in the backfield and 8 linemen (OK, maybe one or two was a tight end) impressed Little and Sarell?
If you are an offensive line recruit, today had to leave you licking your chops.
BC
Should have been a pretty good night for recruiting Sarrell and Little. We won impressively, and Notre Dame and Texas, two of our competitors for them lost.
Anyone know who the other three guys in the picture are?
09-18-2016, 08:26 AM
(09-18-2016, 07:25 AM)rudruff link Wrote:I am going to say Davis Mills, Colby Parkinson & Tucker Fisk.
So you mean from left to right: Mills, Sarrell, Little, Parkinson, Fisk?
(09-18-2016, 07:25 AM)rudruff link Wrote:I am going to say Davis Mills, Colby Parkinson & Tucker Fisk.
So you mean from left to right: Mills, Sarrell, Little, Parkinson, Fisk?
09-20-2016, 02:37 PM
https://stanford.rivals.com/news/five-st...rdinal-win
Free article from Andy about Sarell'a visit. Sounds like he liked what he saw.
BC
Free article from Andy about Sarell'a visit. Sounds like he liked what he saw.
BC
https://stanford.rivals.com/news/five-st...rdinal-win
Free article from Andy about Sarell'a visit. Sounds like he liked what he saw.
BC
Free article from Andy about Sarell'a visit. Sounds like he liked what he saw.
BC
10-01-2016, 04:47 PM
(10-01-2016, 04:42 PM)Boston Card link Wrote:We need Sarell and Little. That was clear yesterday.
I don't disagree but (my guess) they wouldn't make a big impact until 2018 at the earliest. So not necessarily a close connection.
(10-01-2016, 04:42 PM)Boston Card link Wrote:We need Sarell and Little. That was clear yesterday.
I don't disagree but (my guess) they wouldn't make a big impact until 2018 at the earliest. So not necessarily a close connection.
10-01-2016, 04:47 PM
(10-01-2016, 04:42 PM)Boston Card link Wrote:We need Sarell and Little. That was clear yesterday.
I don't disagree but (my guess) they wouldn't make a big impact until 2018 at the earliest. So not necessarily a close connection.
(10-01-2016, 04:42 PM)Boston Card link Wrote:We need Sarell and Little. That was clear yesterday.
I don't disagree but (my guess) they wouldn't make a big impact until 2018 at the earliest. So not necessarily a close connection.
10-02-2016, 08:29 AM
I interpret the comment more about maintaining the full "funnel" of o-line talent to ensure depth and time for development.Â
DIE LUFT DER FREIHEIT WEHT
I interpret the comment more about maintaining the full "funnel" of o-line talent to ensure depth and time for development.Â
DIE LUFT DER FREIHEIT WEHT
10-02-2016, 08:29 AM
I interpret the comment more about maintaining the full "funnel" of o-line talent to ensure depth and time for development.Â
DIE LUFT DER FREIHEIT WEHT
I interpret the comment more about maintaining the full "funnel" of o-line talent to ensure depth and time for development.Â
DIE LUFT DER FREIHEIT WEHT
10-02-2016, 08:44 AM
If Sarell is the #3 player in the country, he will start as a True Frosh at LT. You just can't keep talent like that on the bench, unless you are really deep at the position, and few programs are.Â
If Sarell is the #3 player in the country, he will start as a True Frosh at LT. You just can't keep talent like that on the bench, unless you are really deep at the position, and few programs are.Â
10-02-2016, 08:44 AM
If Sarell is the #3 player in the country, he will start as a True Frosh at LT. You just can't keep talent like that on the bench, unless you are really deep at the position, and few programs are.Â
If Sarell is the #3 player in the country, he will start as a True Frosh at LT. You just can't keep talent like that on the bench, unless you are really deep at the position, and few programs are.Â
10-02-2016, 04:15 PM
(10-02-2016, 08:44 AM)OutsiderFan link Wrote:If Sarell is the #3 player in the country, he will start as a True Frosh at LT. You just can't keep talent like that on the bench, unless you are really deep at the position, and few programs are.
Peat was a better prospect out of HS and didn't play I doubt Sarrell would
(10-02-2016, 08:44 AM)OutsiderFan link Wrote:If Sarell is the #3 player in the country, he will start as a True Frosh at LT. You just can't keep talent like that on the bench, unless you are really deep at the position, and few programs are.
Peat was a better prospect out of HS and didn't play I doubt Sarrell would
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »