08-05-2016, 12:27 PM
Oh Irish . . . oh they wish!Â
DIE LUFT DER FREIHEIT WEHT
(08-05-2016, 02:36 PM)washingtonismoney link Wrote:More ND bitterness: http://www.ndnation.com/boards/showpost....4031;d=all
One poster seems to believe that if N.D. had beaten Stanford last year we couldn't've won the Rose Bowl.
What I find odd is the level of... proprietary feelings these fans have. Whatever the appropriateness with respect to the players -- who get to go wherever they want, after all -- the weirdness of still condescending to Stanford is striking. How long does it take for reality to puncture their bubble?
(08-05-2016, 02:36 PM)washingtonismoney link Wrote:More ND bitterness: http://www.ndnation.com/boards/showpost....4031;d=all
One poster seems to believe that if N.D. had beaten Stanford last year we couldn't've won the Rose Bowl.
What I find odd is the level of... proprietary feelings these fans have. Whatever the appropriateness with respect to the players -- who get to go wherever they want, after all -- the weirdness of still condescending to Stanford is striking. How long does it take for reality to puncture their bubble?
(08-06-2016, 11:28 AM)washingtonismoney link Wrote:Because I enjoy making fun of loopy social media posts way more than I should, here's a UW writer claiming Foster Sarrell will go to Stanford rather than Washington because...the depth chart is easier: http://washington.247sports.com/Board/59...r-46595838
(08-06-2016, 11:28 AM)washingtonismoney link Wrote:Because I enjoy making fun of loopy social media posts way more than I should, here's a UW writer claiming Foster Sarrell will go to Stanford rather than Washington because...the depth chart is easier: http://washington.247sports.com/Board/59...r-46595838
(08-06-2016, 01:04 PM)OutsiderFan link Wrote:If Ruth Robbins is saying Sarrell to Stanford, safe bet to say he is farm-bound. Will Stanford be able to land both Sarrell and Little? I mean wouldn't both want to play LT?
(08-06-2016, 01:04 PM)OutsiderFan link Wrote:If Ruth Robbins is saying Sarrell to Stanford, safe bet to say he is farm-bound. Will Stanford be able to land both Sarrell and Little? I mean wouldn't both want to play LT?
(08-06-2016, 09:31 AM)Yvonne link Wrote:Stanford has been a football power since the prospective student athletes were in elementary school. They don't know much else. However, message board jockeys tend to be much olde,r and understand the lopsidedness of the rivalry. They may even remember the Holtz or even Parseghian eras.
(08-06-2016, 09:31 AM)Yvonne link Wrote:Stanford has been a football power since the prospective student athletes were in elementary school. They don't know much else. However, message board jockeys tend to be much olde,r and understand the lopsidedness of the rivalry. They may even remember the Holtz or even Parseghian eras.
(08-06-2016, 03:20 PM)Boston Card link Wrote:[quote author=OutsiderFan link=topic=11701.msg167257#msg167257 date=1470513882]
If Ruth Robbins is saying Sarrell to Stanford, safe bet to say he is farm-bound. Will Stanford be able to land both Sarrell and Little? I mean wouldn't both want to play LT?
(08-06-2016, 03:20 PM)Boston Card link Wrote:[quote author=OutsiderFan link=topic=11701.msg167257#msg167257 date=1470513882]
If Ruth Robbins is saying Sarrell to Stanford, safe bet to say he is farm-bound. Will Stanford be able to land both Sarrell and Little? I mean wouldn't both want to play LT?