10-05-2013, 10:44 PM
We're going to be lucky to win this one, if we do.
STANFORD GAMEDAY DOMINATION THREAD
Cardinal96
Unregistered
Unregistered
That ball hit the ground. I have no idea how they called it a catch.
10-05-2013, 10:51 PM
Not a catch!
"To the press alone, checkered as it is with abuses, the world is indebted for all the triumphs which have been gained by reason and humanity over error and oppression." ~ James Madison
10-05-2013, 10:52 PM
UW's a very good team, but we need to improve a lot. Fortunately, we won't be seeing Justin Wilcox again.
UW's a very good team, but we need to improve a lot. Fortunately, we won't be seeing Justin Wilcox again.
10-05-2013, 10:54 PM
Whew!
"To the press alone, checkered as it is with abuses, the world is indebted for all the triumphs which have been gained by reason and humanity over error and oppression." ~ James Madison
10-05-2013, 10:55 PM
(10-05-2013, 10:52 PM)washingtonismoney link Wrote:UW's a very good team, but we need to improve a lot. Fortunately, we won't be seeing Justin Wilcox again.
Why?Â
Put a glide in your stride and a dip in your hip.
10-05-2013, 10:57 PM
FWIW, UW's secondary has done this to a lot of guys.
BJ Denker (UA): 3.4 YPA
Scheelhaase (Ill.): 6.2 YPA
Southwick (Boise): 3.8 YPA.
BJ Denker (UA): 3.4 YPA
Scheelhaase (Ill.): 6.2 YPA
Southwick (Boise): 3.8 YPA.
FWIW, UW's secondary has done this to a lot of guys.
BJ Denker (UA): 3.4 YPA
Scheelhaase (Ill.): 6.2 YPA
Southwick (Boise): 3.8 YPA.
BJ Denker (UA): 3.4 YPA
Scheelhaase (Ill.): 6.2 YPA
Southwick (Boise): 3.8 YPA.
10-05-2013, 10:59 PM
(10-05-2013, 10:55 PM)martyup link Wrote:Why?
Unless college football legalized midseason coaching trades, we've already gotten our quota of Wilcox.
To be fair, I didn't make that clear. Next year is a completely different story. I'm hoping some industrious AD takes a shine to Mr. Wilcox's skills. I'll be happy to provide a testimonial to his agent.
(10-05-2013, 10:55 PM)martyup link Wrote:Why?
Unless college football legalized midseason coaching trades, we've already gotten our quota of Wilcox.
To be fair, I didn't make that clear. Next year is a completely different story. I'm hoping some industrious AD takes a shine to Mr. Wilcox's skills. I'll be happy to provide a testimonial to his agent.
10-05-2013, 11:02 PM
(10-05-2013, 10:55 PM)martyup link Wrote:[quote author=washingtonismoney link=topic=8544.msg70195#msg70195 date=1381038763]
UW's a very good team, but we need to improve a lot. Fortunately, we won't be seeing Justin Wilcox again.
Why?
[/quote]
UW outplayed Stanford. Look at the box score. And, Oregon is much better than UW.
http://scores.espn.go.com/ncf/boxscore?gameId=332780024
(10-05-2013, 10:55 PM)martyup link Wrote:[quote author=washingtonismoney link=topic=8544.msg70195#msg70195 date=1381038763]
UW's a very good team, but we need to improve a lot. Fortunately, we won't be seeing Justin Wilcox again.
Why?
[/quote]
UW outplayed Stanford. Look at the box score. And, Oregon is much better than UW.
http://scores.espn.go.com/ncf/boxscore?gameId=332780024
10-05-2013, 11:03 PM
(10-05-2013, 10:52 PM)washingtonismoney link Wrote:UW's a very good team, but we need to improve a lot. Fortunately, we won't be seeing Justin Wilcox again.
No kidding.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UJ2Az8SKWM8
(10-05-2013, 10:52 PM)washingtonismoney link Wrote:UW's a very good team, but we need to improve a lot. Fortunately, we won't be seeing Justin Wilcox again.
No kidding.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UJ2Az8SKWM8
10-05-2013, 11:03 PM
One last thing: aside from that one drive with Hogan and Lloyd, we barely used any read-option. I thought this was a tactical mistake -- UW looked pretty befuddled by it and we never returned to it.
One last thing: aside from that one drive with Hogan and Lloyd, we barely used any read-option. I thought this was a tactical mistake -- UW looked pretty befuddled by it and we never returned to it.
10-05-2013, 11:05 PM
(10-05-2013, 11:03 PM)washingtonismoney link Wrote:One last thing: aside from that one drive with Hogan and Lloyd, we barely used any read-option. I thought this was a tactical mistake -- UW looked pretty befuddled by it and we never returned to it.
This......
Hopefully the coaches use this game as a teaching moment not only for the players but also themselves.
Still, a win is a win, no??
GO STANFORD!!!
(10-05-2013, 11:03 PM)washingtonismoney link Wrote:One last thing: aside from that one drive with Hogan and Lloyd, we barely used any read-option. I thought this was a tactical mistake -- UW looked pretty befuddled by it and we never returned to it.
This......
Hopefully the coaches use this game as a teaching moment not only for the players but also themselves.
Still, a win is a win, no??
GO STANFORD!!!
10-05-2013, 11:08 PM
Great to get that win, but it took a few years off of my life. If that catch hadn't been reversed...
Please clear the field! The game is not over!
10-05-2013, 11:11 PM
Boy, they killed us in the stats. Ty won it for Stanford. We've got to play better than that to beat Oregon. But, we played worse against the Huskies last year and still beat Oregon.
Put a glide in your stride and a dip in your hip.
10-05-2013, 11:12 PM
And, BTW, never use this thread name again!
Put a glide in your stride and a dip in your hip.
Redrum
Unregistered
Unregistered
10-05-2013, 11:13 PM
1)Â Price> Hogan.Â
2) Shaw's conservatism likely to cost us a game this year. All we had to do was make one first down (actually there were about three of those instances), but on the last one a single pass completion somewhere in the truncated drive for first down would have been sufficient to run the clock.Â
3) #36 has got some 'splainin' to do in the film session. His missed block let his man run Hogan to the outside and kept Hogan from turning upfield for the first down.Â
2) Shaw's conservatism likely to cost us a game this year. All we had to do was make one first down (actually there were about three of those instances), but on the last one a single pass completion somewhere in the truncated drive for first down would have been sufficient to run the clock.Â
3) #36 has got some 'splainin' to do in the film session. His missed block let his man run Hogan to the outside and kept Hogan from turning upfield for the first down.Â
1)Â Price> Hogan.Â
2) Shaw's conservatism likely to cost us a game this year. All we had to do was make one first down (actually there were about three of those instances), but on the last one a single pass completion somewhere in the truncated drive for first down would have been sufficient to run the clock.Â
3) #36 has got some 'splainin' to do in the film session. His missed block let his man run Hogan to the outside and kept Hogan from turning upfield for the first down.Â
2) Shaw's conservatism likely to cost us a game this year. All we had to do was make one first down (actually there were about three of those instances), but on the last one a single pass completion somewhere in the truncated drive for first down would have been sufficient to run the clock.Â
3) #36 has got some 'splainin' to do in the film session. His missed block let his man run Hogan to the outside and kept Hogan from turning upfield for the first down.Â
Cardinal96
Unregistered
Unregistered
10-05-2013, 11:13 PM
(10-05-2013, 11:11 PM)martyup link Wrote:Boy, they killed us in the stats. Ty won it for Stanford. We've got to play better than that to beat Oregon. But, we played worse against the Huskies last year and still beat Oregon.
TBH I am not so sure. I have a hunch UW is going to give Oregon a game next week. I also have a hunch UW is a legit top ten team.
(10-05-2013, 11:11 PM)martyup link Wrote:Boy, they killed us in the stats. Ty won it for Stanford. We've got to play better than that to beat Oregon. But, we played worse against the Huskies last year and still beat Oregon.
TBH I am not so sure. I have a hunch UW is going to give Oregon a game next week. I also have a hunch UW is a legit top ten team.
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »