02-14-2014, 05:25 PM
I imagine there are two perceived advantages for the spread that HS WR recruits see: pass happy offenses, and more receivers on the field. They will put up video game numbers, if they are good. Stanford coaches, this year at least, can counter by talking about the strides made in our own receiving corps this year, and the big plays of both Rector and Cajuste.
But also, I think the coaches really need to know who they want to go after. Given our attachment to running the ball, and the often stated need for receivers to be good blockers downfield, we really want someone who is strong enough (or can become strong enough, with the help of Turley and his staff) and is willing to do the less glamorous aspects of the WR position. Griff Whalen showed it's not always about being 6-4, 220. If a recruit isn't willing to do the work to Spring the running game, he probably isn't a good fit for our team in any case.
But also, I think the coaches really need to know who they want to go after. Given our attachment to running the ball, and the often stated need for receivers to be good blockers downfield, we really want someone who is strong enough (or can become strong enough, with the help of Turley and his staff) and is willing to do the less glamorous aspects of the WR position. Griff Whalen showed it's not always about being 6-4, 220. If a recruit isn't willing to do the work to Spring the running game, he probably isn't a good fit for our team in any case.



