08-11-2013, 02:36 PM
Now, I am really offended.Â
(08-16-2013, 09:57 AM)Treefence link Wrote:Any word on Canton Kaumatule? Is he pretty much a Stanford Commit as long as he is accepted?I think that's the general consensus. His freshman grades apparently weren't great, but thankfully Stanford ignores them for admissions purposes. Also I hear that he didn't do any of the summer camp circuit in order to focus on grades and do some summer courses, which makes it sound like he's doing everything he can to get into Stanford.
(08-16-2013, 09:57 AM)Treefence link Wrote:Any word on Canton Kaumatule? Is he pretty much a Stanford Commit as long as he is accepted?I think that's the general consensus. His freshman grades apparently weren't great, but thankfully Stanford ignores them for admissions purposes. Also I hear that he didn't do any of the summer camp circuit in order to focus on grades and do some summer courses, which makes it sound like he's doing everything he can to get into Stanford.
(08-16-2013, 09:40 AM)washingtonismoney link Wrote:Arrington Farrar of GA commits to Stanford: https://twitter.com/RivalsWoody/status/3...1753785344
Farrar is listed by most as a safety. Everyone has him as one of the top prospects in the country as a sophomore -- the only disagreement is whether he's one of the top 250 players or top 100 players. Comes from Woodward Academy, the alma mater of Jordan Watkins.
EDIT: has offers from Vandy, Georgia Tech, South Carolina, Clemson, Wisconsin ...
EDIT 2: It is preposterously early, but we have the best 2015 class in the Pac-12.
(08-16-2013, 09:40 AM)washingtonismoney link Wrote:Arrington Farrar of GA commits to Stanford: https://twitter.com/RivalsWoody/status/3...1753785344
Farrar is listed by most as a safety. Everyone has him as one of the top prospects in the country as a sophomore -- the only disagreement is whether he's one of the top 250 players or top 100 players. Comes from Woodward Academy, the alma mater of Jordan Watkins.
EDIT: has offers from Vandy, Georgia Tech, South Carolina, Clemson, Wisconsin ...
EDIT 2: It is preposterously early, but we have the best 2015 class in the Pac-12.
(08-16-2013, 07:36 PM)terry link Wrote:The members of the class of 2015 just started their junior year in high school. They won't sign their Letters of Intent until a year and a half for now. A lot of things can happen between now and then. It's nice to have a commitment, but we are a long way from seeing a signature on an LOI.
(08-16-2013, 07:36 PM)terry link Wrote:The members of the class of 2015 just started their junior year in high school. They won't sign their Letters of Intent until a year and a half for now. A lot of things can happen between now and then. It's nice to have a commitment, but we are a long way from seeing a signature on an LOI.
(08-16-2013, 08:15 PM)NYCCardinalFan link Wrote:Absolutely true. But boy what a difference a decade makes. We are getting elite class of 2015 players to commit early and are looking strong with respect to several other players in that class. I have only followed Stanford football for 25 years but the depth of athletes we are getting now is like nothing I have ever seen.
(08-16-2013, 08:15 PM)NYCCardinalFan link Wrote:Absolutely true. But boy what a difference a decade makes. We are getting elite class of 2015 players to commit early and are looking strong with respect to several other players in that class. I have only followed Stanford football for 25 years but the depth of athletes we are getting now is like nothing I have ever seen.
(08-17-2013, 08:52 AM)Publius link Wrote:[quote author=NYCCardinalFan link=topic=7902.msg65857#msg65857 date=1376709314]
Absolutely true. But boy what a difference a decade makes. We are getting elite class of 2015 players to commit early and are looking strong with respect to several other players in that class. I have only followed Stanford football for 25 years but the depth of athletes we are getting now is like nothing I have ever seen.
(08-17-2013, 08:52 AM)Publius link Wrote:[quote author=NYCCardinalFan link=topic=7902.msg65857#msg65857 date=1376709314]
Absolutely true. But boy what a difference a decade makes. We are getting elite class of 2015 players to commit early and are looking strong with respect to several other players in that class. I have only followed Stanford football for 25 years but the depth of athletes we are getting now is like nothing I have ever seen.
(08-17-2013, 10:49 AM)garvin link Wrote:I agree with you, JPRI, though I think the team was a lot closer to being a winner in Walsh's final season than he ever gets credit for. (Go back, look at the scores, and then ponder what our record would have been if Eric Abrams' kicking had not gone inexplicably into the tank.) Willing.ham got the team into four bowl games, and that last one was attained with his starting quarterback out half the season -- and, moreover, had absolutely zilch to do with Walsh recruits. I have never understood what happened to Will.ingham after he left Stanford.
(08-17-2013, 10:49 AM)garvin link Wrote:I agree with you, JPRI, though I think the team was a lot closer to being a winner in Walsh's final season than he ever gets credit for. (Go back, look at the scores, and then ponder what our record would have been if Eric Abrams' kicking had not gone inexplicably into the tank.) Willing.ham got the team into four bowl games, and that last one was attained with his starting quarterback out half the season -- and, moreover, had absolutely zilch to do with Walsh recruits. I have never understood what happened to Will.ingham after he left Stanford.
(08-17-2013, 10:49 AM)garvin link Wrote:I have never understood what happened to Will.ingham after he left Stanford.
(08-17-2013, 10:49 AM)garvin link Wrote:I have never understood what happened to Will.ingham after he left Stanford.