(01-10-2013, 01:13 PM)jacketree link Wrote:How many of you drive cars on a regular basis?
[Edit: Which I guess is exactly what Oasis is asking. D'oh!]
Sure cars are dangerous, but they improve a society's mobility, productivity, etc.
Armed Forces, one could argue, defend nation-states, prevent or discourage invasions, terrorism, etc.
Football is a game. Therefore it is not exactly delivering the same personal or societal benefits. The saving grace, IMO, is that people can pursue it voluntarily. If you want to play the game and roll the dice it is your choice. Yet for me even that argument is not quite ideal. People that smoke claim they enjoy it (at least at first), but their health care costs hit everyone. Football is probably in the same place.
Football advocates could also claim an odd set of system benefits much like the tobacco industry used to claim. By performing thousands of knee operations on young & fit teenagers, the quality of the operation has been vastly improved for older types with age related knee injuries.
The idea that football is so heavily promoted by HS and colleges is rather ironic really. And I have definitely wondered how much longer D2 & D3 schools will play the game. I am sure a D3 player gets a network of friends for life, but it seems like such an unnecessary risk with very little upside. Ultimate Frisbee, rowing, sailing, tennis or golf teams seem like much better D3 pursuits. FWIW though - soccer also has some pretty solid evidence that a lifetime full of headers is not exactly good for the brain.
I definitely see football as a fun game, but I had absolutely no problem with the idea that my wife did not want my boys to play the game, even though I am pretty sure my 9 year-old could ultimately make a very good HS Safety.
The sad thing about the Seau situation is that by the time the family started noticing symptoms, it was already way too late.