[Card Fan in OR]

Taylor should be, but, realistically, probably not. He averaged over 100 ypg this year, with his performance in the Fiesta Bowl getting him above the century mark. With perhaps a slightly more run-oriented offense next year, his average could definitely rise a bit--maybe into Toby territory.

I think Shayne Skov is an excellent choice, too, assuming he is back to 100 percent. Unless we're 10-2 before bowl season, though, no chance for one of our players. Plus, I have totally lost faith in the Voldemort process for determining the "best" player.

[Card Fan in OR]

Taylor should be, but, realistically, probably not. He averaged over 100 ypg this year, with his performance in the Fiesta Bowl getting him above the century mark. With perhaps a slightly more run-oriented offense next year, his average could definitely rise a bit--maybe into Toby territory.

I think Shayne Skov is an excellent choice, too, assuming he is back to 100 percent. Unless we're 10-2 before bowl season, though, no chance for one of our players. Plus, I have totally lost faith in the Voldemort process for determining the "best" player.

[Card Fan in OR]

Taylor should be, but, realistically, probably not. He averaged over 100 ypg this year, with his performance in the Fiesta Bowl getting him above the century mark. With perhaps a slightly more run-oriented offense next year, his average could definitely rise a bit--maybe into Toby territory.

I think Shayne Skov is an excellent choice, too, assuming he is back to 100 percent. Unless we're 10-2 before bowl season, though, no chance for one of our players. Plus, I have totally lost faith in the Voldemort process for determining the "best" player.

[Card Fan in OR]

Taylor should be, but, realistically, probably not. He averaged over 100 ypg this year, with his performance in the Fiesta Bowl getting him above the century mark. With perhaps a slightly more run-oriented offense next year, his average could definitely rise a bit--maybe into Toby territory.

I think Shayne Skov is an excellent choice, too, assuming he is back to 100 percent. Unless we're 10-2 before bowl season, though, no chance for one of our players. Plus, I have totally lost faith in the Voldemort process for determining the "best" player.

[Card Fan in OR]

Taylor should be, but, realistically, probably not. He averaged over 100 ypg this year, with his performance in the Fiesta Bowl getting him above the century mark. With perhaps a slightly more run-oriented offense next year, his average could definitely rise a bit--maybe into Toby territory.

I think Shayne Skov is an excellent choice, too, assuming he is back to 100 percent. Unless we're 10-2 before bowl season, though, no chance for one of our players. Plus, I have totally lost faith in the Voldemort process for determining the "best" player.

[Card Fan in OR]

Taylor should be, but, realistically, probably not. He averaged over 100 ypg this year, with his performance in the Fiesta Bowl getting him above the century mark. With perhaps a slightly more run-oriented offense next year, his average could definitely rise a bit--maybe into Toby territory.

I think Shayne Skov is an excellent choice, too, assuming he is back to 100 percent. Unless we're 10-2 before bowl season, though, no chance for one of our players. Plus, I have totally lost faith in the Voldemort process for determining the "best" player.

[Card Fan in OR]

Taylor should be, but, realistically, probably not. He averaged over 100 ypg this year, with his performance in the Fiesta Bowl getting him above the century mark. With perhaps a slightly more run-oriented offense next year, his average could definitely rise a bit--maybe into Toby territory.

I think Shayne Skov is an excellent choice, too, assuming he is back to 100 percent. Unless we're 10-2 before bowl season, though, no chance for one of our players. Plus, I have totally lost faith in the Voldemort process for determining the "best" player.

[Card Fan in OR]

Taylor should be, but, realistically, probably not. He averaged over 100 ypg this year, with his performance in the Fiesta Bowl getting him above the century mark. With perhaps a slightly more run-oriented offense next year, his average could definitely rise a bit--maybe into Toby territory.

I think Shayne Skov is an excellent choice, too, assuming he is back to 100 percent. Unless we're 10-2 before bowl season, though, no chance for one of our players. Plus, I have totally lost faith in the Voldemort process for determining the "best" player.

[fullmetal]

I voted "of course" just for sentiment's sake.  I surely hope that all of Stanford's key contributors are recognized by the media for their contributions and not just for their pedigree.

Stepfan has been great for us even if the RB-by-committee diminishes his numbers.  I'm sure he'd give Montee Ball a run for his money.

[fullmetal]

I voted "of course" just for sentiment's sake.  I surely hope that all of Stanford's key contributors are recognized by the media for their contributions and not just for their pedigree.

Stepfan has been great for us even if the RB-by-committee diminishes his numbers.  I'm sure he'd give Montee Ball a run for his money.

[fullmetal]

I voted "of course" just for sentiment's sake.  I surely hope that all of Stanford's key contributors are recognized by the media for their contributions and not just for their pedigree.

Stepfan has been great for us even if the RB-by-committee diminishes his numbers.  I'm sure he'd give Montee Ball a run for his money.

[fullmetal]

I voted "of course" just for sentiment's sake.  I surely hope that all of Stanford's key contributors are recognized by the media for their contributions and not just for their pedigree.

Stepfan has been great for us even if the RB-by-committee diminishes his numbers.  I'm sure he'd give Montee Ball a run for his money.

[fullmetal]

I voted "of course" just for sentiment's sake.  I surely hope that all of Stanford's key contributors are recognized by the media for their contributions and not just for their pedigree.

Stepfan has been great for us even if the RB-by-committee diminishes his numbers.  I'm sure he'd give Montee Ball a run for his money.

[fullmetal]

I voted "of course" just for sentiment's sake.  I surely hope that all of Stanford's key contributors are recognized by the media for their contributions and not just for their pedigree.

Stepfan has been great for us even if the RB-by-committee diminishes his numbers.  I'm sure he'd give Montee Ball a run for his money.

[fullmetal]

I voted "of course" just for sentiment's sake.  I surely hope that all of Stanford's key contributors are recognized by the media for their contributions and not just for their pedigree.

Stepfan has been great for us even if the RB-by-committee diminishes his numbers.  I'm sure he'd give Montee Ball a run for his money.

[fullmetal]

I voted "of course" just for sentiment's sake.  I surely hope that all of Stanford's key contributors are recognized by the media for their contributions and not just for their pedigree.

Stepfan has been great for us even if the RB-by-committee diminishes his numbers.  I'm sure he'd give Montee Ball a run for his money.