12-10-2022, 10:17 PM
Football Coach Search Master Thread (Troy Taylor)
12-10-2022, 10:49 PM
(12-10-2022, 10:17 PM)BostonCard Wrote:(12-10-2022, 10:11 PM)winflop Wrote: I congratulate the search committee and Muir on making what looks to be a good hire. I sincerely hope it works out that way.
I thought the same when we hired Haase. I hope this isn’t Haase redux (complete with the Berkeley ties).
BC
As much as I thiink Haase should have been shown the door after last season, I will argue to my last breath that he was an excellent hire coming in the door. A great history as an assistant coach and took a mid-major from doormat to dance card in four seasons. It just hasn't worked out like anyone wanted/expected.
(12-10-2022, 10:17 PM)BostonCard Wrote:(12-10-2022, 10:11 PM)winflop Wrote: I congratulate the search committee and Muir on making what looks to be a good hire. I sincerely hope it works out that way.
I thought the same when we hired Haase. I hope this isn’t Haase redux (complete with the Berkeley ties).
BC
As much as I thiink Haase should have been shown the door after last season, I will argue to my last breath that he was an excellent hire coming in the door. A great history as an assistant coach and took a mid-major from doormat to dance card in four seasons. It just hasn't worked out like anyone wanted/expected.
12-10-2022, 11:17 PM
(12-10-2022, 05:08 PM)OutsiderFan Wrote:(12-10-2022, 04:39 PM)washingtonismoney Wrote:(12-10-2022, 04:00 PM)Phogge Wrote: Taylor has found players at Sac State. Why do some people think that he can’t recruit?
I mean, I dunno if he *can't* recruit, but I do wonder whether a four-star lineman in New Jersey will give much of a spit about Taylor... at least until he does something of interest nationally. But maybe Taylor is one of those rare guys who can [insert idiom about good salesmanship here]. If so, great stuff, sign me up.
Any word on who the coordinators and staff might be? Any coaches being retained off Shaw's staff? I would imagine Troy Taylor won't be getting paid top of market to start, so there should be plenty of resources to put together a high quality staff.
I never heard David Shaw talk about recruiting as the top priority focus it must be, and the "you're lucky to get an offer" (paucity of offers) approach obviously hasn't worked out so well. Will be interesting to see if the Harbaugh more offers, not less, approach will be taken by Taylor.
Per the Sacramento Bee article today, Taylor is speculated to make $2-3 million. I really really hope Stanford didn't lose out on someone like Petersen by being cheap.
(12-10-2022, 05:08 PM)OutsiderFan Wrote:(12-10-2022, 04:39 PM)washingtonismoney Wrote:(12-10-2022, 04:00 PM)Phogge Wrote: Taylor has found players at Sac State. Why do some people think that he can’t recruit?
I mean, I dunno if he *can't* recruit, but I do wonder whether a four-star lineman in New Jersey will give much of a spit about Taylor... at least until he does something of interest nationally. But maybe Taylor is one of those rare guys who can [insert idiom about good salesmanship here]. If so, great stuff, sign me up.
Any word on who the coordinators and staff might be? Any coaches being retained off Shaw's staff? I would imagine Troy Taylor won't be getting paid top of market to start, so there should be plenty of resources to put together a high quality staff.
I never heard David Shaw talk about recruiting as the top priority focus it must be, and the "you're lucky to get an offer" (paucity of offers) approach obviously hasn't worked out so well. Will be interesting to see if the Harbaugh more offers, not less, approach will be taken by Taylor.
Per the Sacramento Bee article today, Taylor is speculated to make $2-3 million. I really really hope Stanford didn't lose out on someone like Petersen by being cheap.
12-10-2022, 11:31 PM
Don’t think Petersen was ever in play. Iirc correctly, he said no thanks when we first reached out. The question is whether we lowballed Garrett and that’s why he took his name out (rather than Taylor being the choice among the finalists).
Win, I think you make a fair point. I thought the Haase hire was good at the time. But ultimately, he gets graded on how Haase does. Moreover, Taylor has a similar profile (success at a lower level). Maybe the similarities are superficial, and it will be different. Since the hire has been made, we might as well hope it’s a good one.
BC
Win, I think you make a fair point. I thought the Haase hire was good at the time. But ultimately, he gets graded on how Haase does. Moreover, Taylor has a similar profile (success at a lower level). Maybe the similarities are superficial, and it will be different. Since the hire has been made, we might as well hope it’s a good one.
BC
Don’t think Petersen was ever in play. Iirc correctly, he said no thanks when we first reached out. The question is whether we lowballed Garrett and that’s why he took his name out (rather than Taylor being the choice among the finalists).
Win, I think you make a fair point. I thought the Haase hire was good at the time. But ultimately, he gets graded on how Haase does. Moreover, Taylor has a similar profile (success at a lower level). Maybe the similarities are superficial, and it will be different. Since the hire has been made, we might as well hope it’s a good one.
BC
Win, I think you make a fair point. I thought the Haase hire was good at the time. But ultimately, he gets graded on how Haase does. Moreover, Taylor has a similar profile (success at a lower level). Maybe the similarities are superficial, and it will be different. Since the hire has been made, we might as well hope it’s a good one.
BC
12-11-2022, 02:28 AM
A nice piece from the Daily on the Taylor hiring:
https://stanforddaily.com/2022/12/11/the...-football/
https://stanforddaily.com/2022/12/11/the...-football/
A nice piece from the Daily on the Taylor hiring:
https://stanforddaily.com/2022/12/11/the...-football/
https://stanforddaily.com/2022/12/11/the...-football/
12-11-2022, 10:30 AM
(12-11-2022, 02:28 AM)VB Card Wrote: A nice piece from the Daily on the Taylor hiring:
https://stanforddaily.com/2022/12/11/the...-football/
Interesting. The article implies that there's a chance that Smith could stay.
Earlier in the season, it sounded like Smith was done with our program. Any chance he stays now that there's been a coaching change?
(12-11-2022, 02:28 AM)VB Card Wrote: A nice piece from the Daily on the Taylor hiring:
https://stanforddaily.com/2022/12/11/the...-football/
Interesting. The article implies that there's a chance that Smith could stay.
Earlier in the season, it sounded like Smith was done with our program. Any chance he stays now that there's been a coaching change?
12-11-2022, 10:43 AM
(12-11-2022, 10:30 AM)murky Wrote:(12-11-2022, 02:28 AM)VB Card Wrote: A nice piece from the Daily on the Taylor hiring:Interesting. The article implies that there's a chance that Smith could stay.
https://stanforddaily.com/2022/12/11/the...-football/
Earlier in the season, it sounded like Smith was done with our program. Any chance he stays now that there's been a coaching change?
Smith might thrive in TT's offense.
Put a glide in your stride and a dip in your hip.
(12-11-2022, 10:30 AM)murky Wrote:(12-11-2022, 02:28 AM)VB Card Wrote: A nice piece from the Daily on the Taylor hiring:Interesting. The article implies that there's a chance that Smith could stay.
https://stanforddaily.com/2022/12/11/the...-football/
Earlier in the season, it sounded like Smith was done with our program. Any chance he stays now that there's been a coaching change?
Smith might thrive in TT's offense.
Put a glide in your stride and a dip in your hip.
12-11-2022, 11:42 AM
At this moment RB EJ Smith is not entering the portal but 5th year CB Bonner will not be returning for his final eligible year. Only two things the article didn’t have fully.
(12-11-2022, 10:30 AM)murky Wrote:(12-11-2022, 02:28 AM)VB Card Wrote: A nice piece from the Daily on the Taylor hiring:
https://stanforddaily.com/2022/12/11/the...-football/
Interesting. The article implies that there's a chance that Smith could stay.
Earlier in the season, it sounded like Smith was done with our program. Any chance he stays now that there's been a coaching change?
At this moment RB EJ Smith is not entering the portal but 5th year CB Bonner will not be returning for his final eligible year. Only two things the article didn’t have fully.
(12-11-2022, 10:30 AM)murky Wrote:(12-11-2022, 02:28 AM)VB Card Wrote: A nice piece from the Daily on the Taylor hiring:
https://stanforddaily.com/2022/12/11/the...-football/
Interesting. The article implies that there's a chance that Smith could stay.
Earlier in the season, it sounded like Smith was done with our program. Any chance he stays now that there's been a coaching change?
12-11-2022, 05:28 PM
(12-11-2022, 11:42 AM)footandballtorture Wrote: At this moment RB EJ Smith is not entering the portal but 5th year CB Bonner will not be returning for his final eligible year. Only two things the article didn’t have fully.
thanks for the 411. your info is always appreciated.
Cal delenda est
10-27-2024, 04:59 AM
(12-09-2022, 10:17 PM)StanfordMatt Wrote:(12-09-2022, 05:59 PM)MV72018 Wrote:(12-09-2022, 05:12 PM)BobK Wrote: Hearing announcement at 11 am tomorrow
It’s a short drive from Sacramento
Could well be true, BobK. After all, his bowl game is only 2.5 hours from now.
I think Troy has a lot going for him. He strikes me as someone whom Stanford
players would love and play hard for, as a clever offensive play caller, and as
an energetic and charismatic man who would make a great impression on recruits
and infuse them with his enthusiasm. Even though Jason Garrett was OC for my New
York Giants for a few years, he struck me as somewhat of a stolid fellow. Although
they both went to excellent universities, I'd prefer TT over JG.
He’s a jerk who failed miserably and was fired in his only stint at the P5 level. Horrible hire.
And yes, he has told his staff (at least some of them) that he’s accepted the job. We’d be better off bringing back Buddy Ball. At least Buddy was a nice guy.
Horrible hire from Day 1. Always has been, always will be.
At the end of the day, it falls on Muir. Most people involved in college athletics saw this coming. But Muir has no clue. He decided to have Luck talk to the guy for 10 minutes and supposedly sign off on the hire, and Muir considered his job done.
(12-09-2022, 10:17 PM)StanfordMatt Wrote:(12-09-2022, 05:59 PM)MV72018 Wrote:(12-09-2022, 05:12 PM)BobK Wrote: Hearing announcement at 11 am tomorrow
It’s a short drive from Sacramento
Could well be true, BobK. After all, his bowl game is only 2.5 hours from now.
I think Troy has a lot going for him. He strikes me as someone whom Stanford
players would love and play hard for, as a clever offensive play caller, and as
an energetic and charismatic man who would make a great impression on recruits
and infuse them with his enthusiasm. Even though Jason Garrett was OC for my New
York Giants for a few years, he struck me as somewhat of a stolid fellow. Although
they both went to excellent universities, I'd prefer TT over JG.
He’s a jerk who failed miserably and was fired in his only stint at the P5 level. Horrible hire.
And yes, he has told his staff (at least some of them) that he’s accepted the job. We’d be better off bringing back Buddy Ball. At least Buddy was a nice guy.
Horrible hire from Day 1. Always has been, always will be.
At the end of the day, it falls on Muir. Most people involved in college athletics saw this coming. But Muir has no clue. He decided to have Luck talk to the guy for 10 minutes and supposedly sign off on the hire, and Muir considered his job done.
10-27-2024, 10:44 AM
(10-27-2024, 04:59 AM)StanfordMatt Wrote:(12-09-2022, 10:17 PM)StanfordMatt Wrote:(12-09-2022, 05:59 PM)MV72018 Wrote:(12-09-2022, 05:12 PM)BobK Wrote: Hearing announcement at 11 am tomorrow
It’s a short drive from Sacramento
Could well be true, BobK. After all, his bowl game is only 2.5 hours from now.
I think Troy has a lot going for him. He strikes me as someone whom Stanford
players would love and play hard for, as a clever offensive play caller, and as
an energetic and charismatic man who would make a great impression on recruits
and infuse them with his enthusiasm. Even though Jason Garrett was OC for my New
York Giants for a few years, he struck me as somewhat of a stolid fellow. Although
they both went to excellent universities, I'd prefer TT over JG.
He’s a jerk who failed miserably and was fired in his only stint at the P5 level. Horrible hire.
And yes, he has told his staff (at least some of them) that he’s accepted the job. We’d be better off bringing back Buddy Ball. At least Buddy was a nice guy.
Horrible hire from Day 1. Always has been, always will be.
At the end of the day, it falls on Muir. Most people involved in college athletics saw this coming. But Muir has no clue. He decided to have Luck talk to the guy for 10 minutes and supposedly sign off on the hire, and Muir considered his job done.
Perhaps Muir and Taylor will get fired on the same day. One can dream...
I don't see a strong football coach wanting the Stanford job given the NIL and portal environment, no matter how much Stanford pays. It feels like a career killer job.
Audaces fortuna iuvat
(10-27-2024, 04:59 AM)StanfordMatt Wrote:(12-09-2022, 10:17 PM)StanfordMatt Wrote:(12-09-2022, 05:59 PM)MV72018 Wrote:(12-09-2022, 05:12 PM)BobK Wrote: Hearing announcement at 11 am tomorrow
It’s a short drive from Sacramento
Could well be true, BobK. After all, his bowl game is only 2.5 hours from now.
I think Troy has a lot going for him. He strikes me as someone whom Stanford
players would love and play hard for, as a clever offensive play caller, and as
an energetic and charismatic man who would make a great impression on recruits
and infuse them with his enthusiasm. Even though Jason Garrett was OC for my New
York Giants for a few years, he struck me as somewhat of a stolid fellow. Although
they both went to excellent universities, I'd prefer TT over JG.
He’s a jerk who failed miserably and was fired in his only stint at the P5 level. Horrible hire.
And yes, he has told his staff (at least some of them) that he’s accepted the job. We’d be better off bringing back Buddy Ball. At least Buddy was a nice guy.
Horrible hire from Day 1. Always has been, always will be.
At the end of the day, it falls on Muir. Most people involved in college athletics saw this coming. But Muir has no clue. He decided to have Luck talk to the guy for 10 minutes and supposedly sign off on the hire, and Muir considered his job done.
Perhaps Muir and Taylor will get fired on the same day. One can dream...
I don't see a strong football coach wanting the Stanford job given the NIL and portal environment, no matter how much Stanford pays. It feels like a career killer job.
Audaces fortuna iuvat
10-27-2024, 11:38 AM
JFC, the team just needs a QB, and TT wasn't going to recruit the next Arch Manning last season and play him as a true freshman this season. The defense is on an upward trend, and special teams is at least holding serve. OL is righting the ship, and we have decent horses in the RB stable. It's true that you can't really win without a good QB, and Stanford is proving that right now.
If we have a decent QB and TT still can't win (or if his playcalling causes us to lose), then yeah, that's my threshold.
If we have a decent QB and TT still can't win (or if his playcalling causes us to lose), then yeah, that's my threshold.
JFC, the team just needs a QB, and TT wasn't going to recruit the next Arch Manning last season and play him as a true freshman this season. The defense is on an upward trend, and special teams is at least holding serve. OL is righting the ship, and we have decent horses in the RB stable. It's true that you can't really win without a good QB, and Stanford is proving that right now.
If we have a decent QB and TT still can't win (or if his playcalling causes us to lose), then yeah, that's my threshold.
If we have a decent QB and TT still can't win (or if his playcalling causes us to lose), then yeah, that's my threshold.
10-27-2024, 11:53 AM
(10-27-2024, 11:38 AM)fullmetal Wrote: JFC, the team just needs a QB, and TT wasn't going to recruit the next Arch Manning last season and play him as a true freshman this season. The defense is on an upward trend, and special teams is at least holding serve. OL is righting the ship, and we have decent horses in the RB stable. It's true that you can't really win without a good QB, and Stanford is proving that right now.
If we have a decent QB and TT still can't win (or if his playcalling causes us to lose), then yeah, that's my threshold.
Well let’s remember that TT is also the QB coach — and that whatever he’s telling Daniels doesn’t appear to be sinking in.
And that he’s also the OC — running a high school offense where everything revolves around a QB who is the best athlete on the field.
Maybe he’s just too busy remembering all those Rose Bowls when he was Kal’s QB.
(10-27-2024, 11:38 AM)fullmetal Wrote: JFC, the team just needs a QB, and TT wasn't going to recruit the next Arch Manning last season and play him as a true freshman this season. The defense is on an upward trend, and special teams is at least holding serve. OL is righting the ship, and we have decent horses in the RB stable. It's true that you can't really win without a good QB, and Stanford is proving that right now.
If we have a decent QB and TT still can't win (or if his playcalling causes us to lose), then yeah, that's my threshold.
Well let’s remember that TT is also the QB coach — and that whatever he’s telling Daniels doesn’t appear to be sinking in.
And that he’s also the OC — running a high school offense where everything revolves around a QB who is the best athlete on the field.
Maybe he’s just too busy remembering all those Rose Bowls when he was Kal’s QB.
10-27-2024, 12:27 PM
(This post was last modified: 10-27-2024, 12:29 PM by CardinalSagehen.)
(10-27-2024, 04:59 AM)StanfordMatt Wrote:(12-09-2022, 10:17 PM)StanfordMatt Wrote:(12-09-2022, 05:59 PM)MV72018 Wrote:(12-09-2022, 05:12 PM)BobK Wrote: Hearing announcement at 11 am tomorrow
It’s a short drive from Sacramento
Could well be true, BobK. After all, his bowl game is only 2.5 hours from now.
I think Troy has a lot going for him. He strikes me as someone whom Stanford
players would love and play hard for, as a clever offensive play caller, and as
an energetic and charismatic man who would make a great impression on recruits
and infuse them with his enthusiasm. Even though Jason Garrett was OC for my New
York Giants for a few years, he struck me as somewhat of a stolid fellow. Although
they both went to excellent universities, I'd prefer TT over JG.
He’s a jerk who failed miserably and was fired in his only stint at the P5 level. Horrible hire.
And yes, he has told his staff (at least some of them) that he’s accepted the job. We’d be better off bringing back Buddy Ball. At least Buddy was a nice guy.
Horrible hire from Day 1. Always has been, always will be.
At the end of the day, it falls on Muir. Most people involved in college athletics saw this coming. But Muir has no clue. He decided to have Luck talk to the guy for 10 minutes and supposedly sign off on the hire, and Muir considered his job done.
Matt, you seem to know TT personally or have a second-degree connection to him. How do you know him to be a jerk? That's an interesting perspective. It cuts against the common narrative of him being a supportive and "loving" coach, which he plays into with his mild-mannered interviews and commentary.
Realistically, TT might actually need to be considered a jerk by players and peers at Stanford if he's going to be replaced after this season.
10-27-2024, 12:27 PM
(This post was last modified: 10-27-2024, 12:29 PM by CardinalSagehen.)
(10-27-2024, 04:59 AM)StanfordMatt Wrote:(12-09-2022, 10:17 PM)StanfordMatt Wrote:(12-09-2022, 05:59 PM)MV72018 Wrote:(12-09-2022, 05:12 PM)BobK Wrote: Hearing announcement at 11 am tomorrow
It’s a short drive from Sacramento
Could well be true, BobK. After all, his bowl game is only 2.5 hours from now.
I think Troy has a lot going for him. He strikes me as someone whom Stanford
players would love and play hard for, as a clever offensive play caller, and as
an energetic and charismatic man who would make a great impression on recruits
and infuse them with his enthusiasm. Even though Jason Garrett was OC for my New
York Giants for a few years, he struck me as somewhat of a stolid fellow. Although
they both went to excellent universities, I'd prefer TT over JG.
He’s a jerk who failed miserably and was fired in his only stint at the P5 level. Horrible hire.
And yes, he has told his staff (at least some of them) that he’s accepted the job. We’d be better off bringing back Buddy Ball. At least Buddy was a nice guy.
Horrible hire from Day 1. Always has been, always will be.
At the end of the day, it falls on Muir. Most people involved in college athletics saw this coming. But Muir has no clue. He decided to have Luck talk to the guy for 10 minutes and supposedly sign off on the hire, and Muir considered his job done.
Matt, you seem to know TT personally or have a second-degree connection to him. How do you know him to be a jerk? That's an interesting perspective. It cuts against the common narrative of him being a supportive and "loving" coach, which he plays into with his mild-mannered interviews and commentary.
Realistically, TT might actually need to be considered a jerk by players and peers at Stanford if he's going to be replaced after this season.
10-27-2024, 01:03 PM
(10-27-2024, 12:27 PM)CardinalSagehen Wrote: Realistically, TT might actually need to be considered a jerk by players and peers at Stanford if he's going to be replaced after this season.IMO this is absolutely true. Unless his team expresses the opinion he should be replaced, he won't be.
10-29-2024, 10:22 PM
(10-29-2024, 01:32 PM)ADPinWDC Wrote: WHY NOT?
How can that be worse?,
with Bloomgren emphasis on O-Line.
It cannot.
Bloomgren should have thrived at Rice, but he didn't for some reason. In fact, a mid-season firing speaks loudly of what the Rice AD thinks of him, and if he's not good enough for Rice, then I don't know if Muir will see differently.
(10-29-2024, 01:32 PM)ADPinWDC Wrote: WHY NOT?
How can that be worse?,
with Bloomgren emphasis on O-Line.
It cannot.
Bloomgren should have thrived at Rice, but he didn't for some reason. In fact, a mid-season firing speaks loudly of what the Rice AD thinks of him, and if he's not good enough for Rice, then I don't know if Muir will see differently.
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

