11-26-2017, 12:07 PM
Would be great to beat three top ten teams pretty much in a row. Tough road to hoe, tho.
Free Phogge!!!! And no, crimson doesn't refer to the Tide.
Stanford #15, USC #9.
Free Phogge!!!! And no, crimson doesn't refer to the Tide.
Would be great to beat three top ten teams pretty much in a row. Tough road to hoe, tho.
Free Phogge!!!! And no, crimson doesn't refer to the Tide.
11-26-2017, 12:11 PM
I'm all in for FOUR - include the Fiesta Bowl after we take care of business on Friday.
Great point!
Free Phogge!!!! And no, crimson doesn't refer to the Tide.
11-26-2017, 12:42 PM
And SDSU is #25 in the Coaches Poll. So we've played 5 top 25 teams, with a 6th coming Friday.
And SDSU is #25 in the Coaches Poll. So we've played 5 top 25 teams, with a 6th coming Friday.
11-26-2017, 04:02 PM
(11-26-2017, 12:07 PM)cardcrimson link Wrote:Would be great to beat three top ten teams pretty much in a row. Tough road to hoe, tho.
Um, Cal is unranked and they were in between our wins against UW and ND. So, it would be great if we beta three ranked teams in four games (or, four in five).
BC
(11-26-2017, 12:07 PM)cardcrimson link Wrote:Would be great to beat three top ten teams pretty much in a row. Tough road to hoe, tho.
Um, Cal is unranked and they were in between our wins against UW and ND. So, it would be great if we beta three ranked teams in four games (or, four in five).
BC
11-26-2017, 04:03 PM
fwiw, these two guys both think Stanford vs Michigan in Holiday Bowl for now.
http://www.espn.com/college-football/sto...tions-2017
http://www.espn.com/college-football/sto...tions-2017
fwiw, these two guys both think Stanford vs Michigan in Holiday Bowl for now.
http://www.espn.com/college-football/sto...tions-2017
http://www.espn.com/college-football/sto...tions-2017
11-26-2017, 05:24 PM
(11-26-2017, 04:02 PM)Boston Card link Wrote:[quote author=cardcrimson link=topic=18168.msg215074#msg215074 date=1511723265]
Would be great to beat three top ten teams pretty much in a row. Tough road to hoe, tho.
Um, ×ÉÉ is unranked and they were in between our wins against UW and ND. So, it would be great if we beta three ranked teams in four games (or, four in five).
BC
[/quote]
Hence the words "pretty much in a row". Thought last week's Big Game was self evident to anyone that followed Stanford football. Guess not.
Free Phogge!!!! And no, crimson doesn't refer to the Tide.
(11-26-2017, 04:02 PM)Boston Card link Wrote:[quote author=cardcrimson link=topic=18168.msg215074#msg215074 date=1511723265]
Would be great to beat three top ten teams pretty much in a row. Tough road to hoe, tho.
Um, ×ÉÉ is unranked and they were in between our wins against UW and ND. So, it would be great if we beta three ranked teams in four games (or, four in five).
BC
[/quote]
Hence the words "pretty much in a row". Thought last week's Big Game was self evident to anyone that followed Stanford football. Guess not.
Free Phogge!!!! And no, crimson doesn't refer to the Tide.
11-26-2017, 07:45 PM
(11-26-2017, 06:00 PM)TRD link Wrote:I wonder what the game plan is to slow down Darnold this time?
WSU put a ton of pressure on Darnold. One of his starting Ols were out, two more went out during the game. Pressure rattled Darnold, though. He also fumbled against WSU.
Audaces fortuna iuvat
(11-26-2017, 06:00 PM)TRD link Wrote:I wonder what the game plan is to slow down Darnold this time?
WSU put a ton of pressure on Darnold. One of his starting Ols were out, two more went out during the game. Pressure rattled Darnold, though. He also fumbled against WSU.
Audaces fortuna iuvat
11-26-2017, 08:53 PM
(11-26-2017, 08:14 PM)TreesAndBirds link Wrote:FWIW.....We are the highest ranked 3 loss team.Which is quite nice. Let's not become the highest ranked four loss team :).
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »