[82lsju]

[quote author=eric link=topic=17781.msg207909#msg207909 date=1509040035]
from the file

base pay - $2.9m
bonus and incentives - $0.5m
other reportable comp (which appears to be a housing subsidy based on a note in the return) - $1.8m
retirement and other deferred comp - $0.5m
non-taxable benefits - $0.04m

total - $5.7m

they show $1.35m of the base pay was from deferred comp in previous years

$150k per month in housing subsidy?  Must be quite a house...
[/quote]

the wording in the return

THE FOLLOWING INDIVIDUALS RECEIVED TAXABLE HOUSING BENEFITS DURING
CALENDAR YEAR 2015: JOHN ETCHEMENDY, LLOYD B. MINOR, WILLIAM MADIA,
RICHARD SALLER, DAVID SHAW, MARTIN SHELL, ROBERT F. WALLACE, TARA
VANDERVEER, AND YIPING WOO. THESE AMOUNTS ARE INCLUDED IN SCHEDULE J,
PART II, COLUMN (B)(III).

and the same income category for others (up to $3.1m) makes me think that these subsidies 

1.  might, or might not, include more than housing or might be some sort of accounting for a mortgage that is subsidized or forgiven over time or something else entirely (I'm no tax expert)
2.  are not annual events, his housing subsidy the previous year was $87k

for the same item in the same year Tara had $1.3m in reported comp

[82lsju]

[quote author=eric link=topic=17781.msg207909#msg207909 date=1509040035]
from the file

base pay - $2.9m
bonus and incentives - $0.5m
other reportable comp (which appears to be a housing subsidy based on a note in the return) - $1.8m
retirement and other deferred comp - $0.5m
non-taxable benefits - $0.04m

total - $5.7m

they show $1.35m of the base pay was from deferred comp in previous years

$150k per month in housing subsidy?  Must be quite a house...
[/quote]

the wording in the return

THE FOLLOWING INDIVIDUALS RECEIVED TAXABLE HOUSING BENEFITS DURING
CALENDAR YEAR 2015: JOHN ETCHEMENDY, LLOYD B. MINOR, WILLIAM MADIA,
RICHARD SALLER, DAVID SHAW, MARTIN SHELL, ROBERT F. WALLACE, TARA
VANDERVEER, AND YIPING WOO. THESE AMOUNTS ARE INCLUDED IN SCHEDULE J,
PART II, COLUMN (B)(III).

and the same income category for others (up to $3.1m) makes me think that these subsidies 

1.  might, or might not, include more than housing or might be some sort of accounting for a mortgage that is subsidized or forgiven over time or something else entirely (I'm no tax expert)
2.  are not annual events, his housing subsidy the previous year was $87k

for the same item in the same year Tara had $1.3m in reported comp

[CowboyIndian]

I've been thinking about Ty lately.  I recall thinking when he left that he had seriously underestimated his own abilities.

History....and your ensuing argument...do not support this.

[CowboyIndian]

I've been thinking about Ty lately.  I recall thinking when he left that he had seriously underestimated his own abilities.

History....and your ensuing argument...do not support this.

[Hurlburt88]

Meant to type “overestimated “?

[Hurlburt88]

Meant to type “overestimated “?

[Mick]

Meant to type “overestimated “?

yes, sorry, "overestimated."  Thank you both.  And if you read my narrative, it supports over, versus under...;)

[Mick]

Meant to type “overestimated “?

yes, sorry, "overestimated."  Thank you both.  And if you read my narrative, it supports over, versus under...;)

[BostonCard]

I think teejers missed the Dawkins years on this board.  I think I counted one Dawkins defender here, and he cross-posted on the Bootleg.  I wasn’t around for the Buddy/Wlat years, but it would have been hard for me to believe that anyone would have been defending the shotgun draw as our primary offensive philosophy back then.

Shaw is generally defended around these parts because he deserves to be defended; he’s. A good coach!

BC

[BostonCard]

I think teejers missed the Dawkins years on this board.  I think I counted one Dawkins defender here, and he cross-posted on the Bootleg.  I wasn’t around for the Buddy/Wlat years, but it would have been hard for me to believe that anyone would have been defending the shotgun draw as our primary offensive philosophy back then.

Shaw is generally defended around these parts because he deserves to be defended; he’s. A good coach!

BC