[CompSci87]

I am noticing something odd, though harmless. On my Android phone at least, when the table of contents page for the Cardboard is drawn, the New icons show up in orange for an instant and then are instantly redrawn in red.

[CompSci87]

I am noticing something odd, though harmless. On my Android phone at least, when the table of contents page for the Cardboard is drawn, the New icons show up in orange for an instant and then are instantly redrawn in red.

[Leftcoast]

Love the new updated look - it's good to keep things fresh and there's much to like here.

I'm also having a problem getting my fat thumbs to punch the right number when advancing from, for example, page 1 to page 2 in a thread.  I'm equally likely to reload page 1 or advance straight to 3 (without passing GO or collecting my $200).  Blame it on genetics or just years of missing the nail when handed a hammer but my thumbs are too big for the microscopic numbers.  Zooming out used to work but now the software just laughs and seemingly says, "Try again you fat fingered troglodyte!" before taking me on to my 23rd repeat viewing of page 3. 

Anyway, when you get a chance increasing the page number size/spacing would be a great addition (or just turn zoom back on!).  Alternatively, I can buy a 5 pack of IPhones to replace the ones I throw at my wall and smash with a scream of troglodyte frustration.

Thanks again, Yvonne,  for all your work here!

[Leftcoast]

Love the new updated look - it's good to keep things fresh and there's much to like here.

I'm also having a problem getting my fat thumbs to punch the right number when advancing from, for example, page 1 to page 2 in a thread.  I'm equally likely to reload page 1 or advance straight to 3 (without passing GO or collecting my $200).  Blame it on genetics or just years of missing the nail when handed a hammer but my thumbs are too big for the microscopic numbers.  Zooming out used to work but now the software just laughs and seemingly says, "Try again you fat fingered troglodyte!" before taking me on to my 23rd repeat viewing of page 3. 

Anyway, when you get a chance increasing the page number size/spacing would be a great addition (or just turn zoom back on!).  Alternatively, I can buy a 5 pack of IPhones to replace the ones I throw at my wall and smash with a scream of troglodyte frustration.

Thanks again, Yvonne,  for all your work here!

[GoodGrief]

Love the new updated look - it's good to keep things fresh and there's much to like here.

I'm also having a problem getting my fat thumbs to punch the right number when advancing from, for example, page 1 to page 2 in a thread.  I'm equally likely to reload page 1 or advance straight to 3 (without passing GO or collecting my $200).  Blame it on genetics or just years of missing the nail when handed a hammer but my thumbs are too big for the microscopic numbers.  Zooming out used to work but now the software just laughs and seemingly says, "Try again you fat fingered troglodyte!" before taking me on to my 23rd repeat viewing of page 3. 

Anyway, when you get a chance increasing the page number size/spacing would be a great addition (or just turn zoom back on!).  Alternatively, I can buy a 5 pack of IPhones to replace the ones I throw at my wall and smash with a scream of troglodyte frustration.

Thanks again, Yvonne,  for all your work here!

Everything leftcoast just said. The revamp is awesome, and I love it and totally appreciate Yvonne's work. If it's at all possible, it'd be nice to have larger page numbers and/or spacing between the page numbers, and/or the ability to zoom in more so that we can more accurately jump to the page that we want on our phones. Thank you!

[GoodGrief]

Love the new updated look - it's good to keep things fresh and there's much to like here.

I'm also having a problem getting my fat thumbs to punch the right number when advancing from, for example, page 1 to page 2 in a thread.  I'm equally likely to reload page 1 or advance straight to 3 (without passing GO or collecting my $200).  Blame it on genetics or just years of missing the nail when handed a hammer but my thumbs are too big for the microscopic numbers.  Zooming out used to work but now the software just laughs and seemingly says, "Try again you fat fingered troglodyte!" before taking me on to my 23rd repeat viewing of page 3. 

Anyway, when you get a chance increasing the page number size/spacing would be a great addition (or just turn zoom back on!).  Alternatively, I can buy a 5 pack of IPhones to replace the ones I throw at my wall and smash with a scream of troglodyte frustration.

Thanks again, Yvonne,  for all your work here!

Everything leftcoast just said. The revamp is awesome, and I love it and totally appreciate Yvonne's work. If it's at all possible, it'd be nice to have larger page numbers and/or spacing between the page numbers, and/or the ability to zoom in more so that we can more accurately jump to the page that we want on our phones. Thank you!

[Card Fan in OR]

Not to beat a dead horse, but everything leftcoast and GoodGrief said. The tiny page numbers make it really difficult to proceed from one page to the next. Either larger page numbers or the ability to zoom would be exceedingly helpful. Everything else great. Thanks.

[Card Fan in OR]

Not to beat a dead horse, but everything leftcoast and GoodGrief said. The tiny page numbers make it really difficult to proceed from one page to the next. Either larger page numbers or the ability to zoom would be exceedingly helpful. Everything else great. Thanks.

[CornFed]

I also will chime in w/ accolades for the results of your efforts, Yvonne.  Just a matter of curiosity, though.  When I refresh the page to get the threads w/ new posts, there are often threads interspersed among them which, apparently do not have new posts.  Why does that happen if the threads are listed in order of the most recent posts w/in each thread?  Or is that not the basis on which they are ordered?

[CornFed]

I also will chime in w/ accolades for the results of your efforts, Yvonne.  Just a matter of curiosity, though.  When I refresh the page to get the threads w/ new posts, there are often threads interspersed among them which, apparently do not have new posts.  Why does that happen if the threads are listed in order of the most recent posts w/in each thread?  Or is that not the basis on which they are ordered?

[BostonCard]

I also will chime in w/ accolades for the results of your efforts, Yvonne.  Just a matter of curiosity, though.  When I refresh the page to get the threads w/ new posts, there are often threads interspersed among them which, apparently do not have new posts.  Why does that happen if the threads are listed in order of the most recent posts w/in each thread?  Or is that not the basis on which they are ordered?

I believe that whenever someone edits a previous posting, it marks the thread as "new" but doesn't change the order.  That was the case before the facelift so it is not due to the template change.

BC

[BostonCard]

I also will chime in w/ accolades for the results of your efforts, Yvonne.  Just a matter of curiosity, though.  When I refresh the page to get the threads w/ new posts, there are often threads interspersed among them which, apparently do not have new posts.  Why does that happen if the threads are listed in order of the most recent posts w/in each thread?  Or is that not the basis on which they are ordered?

I believe that whenever someone edits a previous posting, it marks the thread as "new" but doesn't change the order.  That was the case before the facelift so it is not due to the template change.

BC

[CornFed]

[quote author=CornFed link=topic=15790.msg174918#msg174918 date=1475795204]
I also will chime in w/ accolades for the results of your efforts, Yvonne.  Just a matter of curiosity, though.  When I refresh the page to get the threads w/ new posts, there are often threads interspersed among them which, apparently do not have new posts.  Why does that happen if the threads are listed in order of the most recent posts w/in each thread?  Or is that not the basis on which they are ordered?

I believe that whenever someone edits a previous posting, it marks the thread as "new" but doesn't change the order.  That was the case before the facelift so it is not due to the template change.

BC
[/quote]

Thanks

[CornFed]

[quote author=CornFed link=topic=15790.msg174918#msg174918 date=1475795204]
I also will chime in w/ accolades for the results of your efforts, Yvonne.  Just a matter of curiosity, though.  When I refresh the page to get the threads w/ new posts, there are often threads interspersed among them which, apparently do not have new posts.  Why does that happen if the threads are listed in order of the most recent posts w/in each thread?  Or is that not the basis on which they are ordered?

I believe that whenever someone edits a previous posting, it marks the thread as "new" but doesn't change the order.  That was the case before the facelift so it is not due to the template change.

BC
[/quote]

Thanks

[CompSci87]

I noticed what looks like a bug in the mobile view. At the bottom of the page there is the following key to what some of the icons mean, but these icons aren't actually used. (The pin and lock icons are used.)

Topic you have posted in
Normal Topic
Hot Topic (More than 5 replies)
Very Hot Topic (More than 10 replies)

[CompSci87]

I noticed what looks like a bug in the mobile view. At the bottom of the page there is the following key to what some of the icons mean, but these icons aren't actually used. (The pin and lock icons are used.)

Topic you have posted in
Normal Topic
Hot Topic (More than 5 replies)
Very Hot Topic (More than 10 replies)