09-24-2016, 07:54 PM
Ugh. Why are we rushing 3?
Stanford at UCLA Game Thread
Rosen had been salivating for an opportunity to flash his arm.
09-24-2016, 07:55 PM
And UCLA appears intent on taking it.
Yeah, I just stare at my desk, but it looks like I'm working .I'd say in a given week I probably only do about fifteen minutes of real, actual, work. Peter Gibbons
09-24-2016, 07:56 PM
(09-24-2016, 07:53 PM)TRD link Wrote:Has anyone else noted the number of 'leading with the helmet' tackles UKLA is attempting/making? It's kind of stunning.
Refs need to call these. Send a message to the UCLA coaches that they need to teach the kids how to tackle.
(09-24-2016, 07:53 PM)TRD link Wrote:Has anyone else noted the number of 'leading with the helmet' tackles UKLA is attempting/making? It's kind of stunning.
Refs need to call these. Send a message to the UCLA coaches that they need to teach the kids how to tackle.
09-24-2016, 07:58 PM
Fowler and Herbsteit: Stanford getting out-Stanforded
Rosen heating up
Rosen heating up
Yeah, I just stare at my desk, but it looks like I'm working .I'd say in a given week I probably only do about fifteen minutes of real, actual, work. Peter Gibbons
09-24-2016, 07:59 PM
Time to take them to the woodshed!
![[Image: 1428507713-jcvd-12.gif]](http://esq.h-cdn.co/assets/15/15/1428507713-jcvd-12.gif)
Put a glide in your stride and a dip in your hip.
09-24-2016, 08:00 PM
Yep. Winning time.
Yeah, I just stare at my desk, but it looks like I'm working .I'd say in a given week I probably only do about fifteen minutes of real, actual, work. Peter Gibbons
09-24-2016, 08:00 PM
(09-24-2016, 07:59 PM)ThePOC link Wrote:Is a 6:32 touchdown drive too much to ask for?
Nope. That would be standard Shaw.
O-line winning the trenches.
(09-24-2016, 07:59 PM)ThePOC link Wrote:Is a 6:32 touchdown drive too much to ask for?
Nope. That would be standard Shaw.
O-line winning the trenches.
09-24-2016, 08:01 PM
Do we go for 2 if we score?
Put a glide in your stride and a dip in your hip.
09-24-2016, 08:02 PM
(09-24-2016, 08:01 PM)martyup link Wrote:Do we go for 2 if we score?
No, I'd just go for the 1.
(09-24-2016, 08:01 PM)martyup link Wrote:Do we go for 2 if we score?
No, I'd just go for the 1.
09-24-2016, 08:03 PM
(09-24-2016, 08:01 PM)martyup link Wrote:Do we go for 2 if we score?
Hell no, if we get 7 we're up by three! Can't give them a chance to win with a FG.
(09-24-2016, 08:01 PM)martyup link Wrote:Do we go for 2 if we score?
Hell no, if we get 7 we're up by three! Can't give them a chance to win with a FG.
09-24-2016, 08:06 PM
Tucker is a project?
Now they have to go for it.
Now they have to go for it.
Yeah, I just stare at my desk, but it looks like I'm working .I'd say in a given week I probably only do about fifteen minutes of real, actual, work. Peter Gibbons
09-24-2016, 08:06 PM
We're losing, why let the clock run down!
Also, I thought Burns got the first?
Also, I thought Burns got the first?
We're losing, why let the clock run down!
Also, I thought Burns got the first?
Also, I thought Burns got the first?
09-24-2016, 08:06 PM
(09-24-2016, 08:01 PM)martyup link Wrote:Do we go for 2 if we score?
Do you even math 'bro?
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »