[amartinsu13]

Stanford 41
UCLA 24

Stanford runs for more than 300 yards.
We hold Perkins to under 100 yards.
Rosen throws more than 35 times, but only completes 55%.
We win the possession battle 38min to 22min.
We finally force a turnover in a game...

[amartinsu13]

Stanford 41
UCLA 24

Stanford runs for more than 300 yards.
We hold Perkins to under 100 yards.
Rosen throws more than 35 times, but only completes 55%.
We win the possession battle 38min to 22min.
We finally force a turnover in a game...

[Treebound]

Stanford 40
UCLA 30

I do expect us to rattle Rosen and ideally get a solid pick or two! 

[Treebound]

Stanford 40
UCLA 30

I do expect us to rattle Rosen and ideally get a solid pick or two! 

[washingtonismoney]

37-24

[washingtonismoney]

37-24

[pefloresjr]

Stanford 41
Ruins 24

Cheers,
Pete F.

[pefloresjr]

Stanford 41
Ruins 24

Cheers,
Pete F.

[BostonCard]

37-24

I'll put you down as favoring the home team unless you indicate otherwise.

BC

[BostonCard]

37-24

I'll put you down as favoring the home team unless you indicate otherwise.

BC

[BigEasyCard]

Cardinal  45
Bruins 24

Geaux Cardinal!

[BigEasyCard]

Cardinal  45
Bruins 24

Geaux Cardinal!

[81alum]

Stanford 42
UCLA 27

[81alum]

Stanford 42
UCLA 27

[Hank 91]

Me: 38-17, Stanford
UCLA blogger: 27-26, UCLA

[Hank 91]

Me: 38-17, Stanford
UCLA blogger: 27-26, UCLA

[washingtonismoney]

The ESPN crew is unanimous in predicting a tight Stanford victory: http://espn.go.com/blog/pac12/post/_/id/...nst-oregon

[washingtonismoney]

The ESPN crew is unanimous in predicting a tight Stanford victory: http://espn.go.com/blog/pac12/post/_/id/...nst-oregon

[FarmBoy]

41-17 for the good guys.

[FarmBoy]

41-17 for the good guys.

[Extra Point]

Stanford  27
UCLA      20

[Extra Point]

Stanford  27
UCLA      20

[CTcard]

The ESPN crew is unanimous in predicting a tight Stanford victory: http://espn.go.com/blog/pac12/post/_/id/...nst-oregon

It seems particularly odd that they all pick the same score. Four have 27-24, one has 28-24.
They also don't seem to think there will be all that much scoring.

[CTcard]

The ESPN crew is unanimous in predicting a tight Stanford victory: http://espn.go.com/blog/pac12/post/_/id/...nst-oregon

It seems particularly odd that they all pick the same score. Four have 27-24, one has 28-24.
They also don't seem to think there will be all that much scoring.

[Hank 91]

[quote author=washingtonismoney link=topic=13129.msg134684#msg134684 date=1444921249]
The ESPN crew is unanimous in predicting a tight Stanford victory: http://espn.go.com/blog/pac12/post/_/id/...nst-oregon

It seems particularly odd that they all pick the same score. Four have 27-24, one has 28-24.
They also don't seem to think there will be all that much scoring.
[/quote]
You know what was really odd? All except for one picked USC over Notre Dame. Circling the wagons, I guess.

[Hank 91]

[quote author=washingtonismoney link=topic=13129.msg134684#msg134684 date=1444921249]
The ESPN crew is unanimous in predicting a tight Stanford victory: http://espn.go.com/blog/pac12/post/_/id/...nst-oregon

It seems particularly odd that they all pick the same score. Four have 27-24, one has 28-24.
They also don't seem to think there will be all that much scoring.
[/quote]
You know what was really odd? All except for one picked USC over Notre Dame. Circling the wagons, I guess.

[StanfordIndians1]

trees 27
gold helmets 17

[StanfordIndians1]

trees 27
gold helmets 17

[61_Shasta]

Stanford 28
UCLA 24

[61_Shasta]

Stanford 28
UCLA 24

[BostonCard]

Wilner picked us as his five-star special.  Sadly, the 5 star special only has a 3-3 record (though that's ATS, so it gives us some leeway).

BC

[BostonCard]

Wilner picked us as his five-star special.  Sadly, the 5 star special only has a 3-3 record (though that's ATS, so it gives us some leeway).

BC

[CTcard]

Wilner picked us as his five-star special.  Sadly, the 5 star special only has a 3-3 record (though that's ATS, so it gives us some leeway).

Specifically he has Stanford 38-28.
I am not sure if he usually picks a score, which would preclude him from entering our contest along with the espn guys.

------------
By the way, in that post, speaking of the upcoming $C coaching hire, Wilner states,
"The best way to judge the hire is by the reaction in the 11 other football offices throughout the conference. Sarkisian-to-USC did not cause knots in stomachs."

I suppose that might be true ... if you had any way to know the real reaction in the football offices. While it seems likely to be true, I am pretty sure Wilner is just making up that little factoid about stomach knots.

[CTcard]

Wilner picked us as his five-star special.  Sadly, the 5 star special only has a 3-3 record (though that's ATS, so it gives us some leeway).

Specifically he has Stanford 38-28.
I am not sure if he usually picks a score, which would preclude him from entering our contest along with the espn guys.

------------
By the way, in that post, speaking of the upcoming $C coaching hire, Wilner states,
"The best way to judge the hire is by the reaction in the 11 other football offices throughout the conference. Sarkisian-to-USC did not cause knots in stomachs."

I suppose that might be true ... if you had any way to know the real reaction in the football offices. While it seems likely to be true, I am pretty sure Wilner is just making up that little factoid about stomach knots.

[BostonCard]

No, Wilner doesn't usually put up a score, just makes picks against the spread.

BC

[BostonCard]

No, Wilner doesn't usually put up a score, just makes picks against the spread.

BC

[CTcard]

I suppose it's about time to pony up this week's prediction that won't be very close.

Big Daddy Trees - 35
Little Baby Bears - 24

Boy Wonder gets some yards, but Stanford gets yards far more consistently and eats the clock. Unfortunately, the 40 point streak falls.

[CTcard]

I suppose it's about time to pony up this week's prediction that won't be very close.

Big Daddy Trees - 35
Little Baby Bears - 24

Boy Wonder gets some yards, but Stanford gets yards far more consistently and eats the clock. Unfortunately, the 40 point streak falls.

[BostonCard]

From Hank's blog post (http://www.gomightycard.com/2015/10/blog...ruins.html)

Opposing Blogger:

Streaks cannot last forever, and seeing how wackiness runs wild in Thursday night games, I am going UCLA 27-Stanford 26.

BC

[BostonCard]

From Hank's blog post (http://www.gomightycard.com/2015/10/blog...ruins.html)

Opposing Blogger:

Streaks cannot last forever, and seeing how wackiness runs wild in Thursday night games, I am going UCLA 27-Stanford 26.

BC