[dabigv13]

The thing is, voters would really have to do a number on the vote to overcome Wisco\'s lack of computer support. If we ignore TCU, and the fact that their computer lead is pretty significant over us, Wisco would still not be the #2 team even if they were voted as such in the polls because of our computer lead over them.

I\'m not saying it\'s not possible for the voters to influence things, but I think they would do so by elevating Wisco, not dropping Stanford, and I\'m not sure that would get it done.

It\'s moot anyways because of TCU, but I personally think all this doomsday scenario talk is just hogwash- voters might not elevate us as they should, but I highly doubt they would significantly drop us.

[dabigv13]

The thing is, voters would really have to do a number on the vote to overcome Wisco\'s lack of computer support. If we ignore TCU, and the fact that their computer lead is pretty significant over us, Wisco would still not be the #2 team even if they were voted as such in the polls because of our computer lead over them.

I\'m not saying it\'s not possible for the voters to influence things, but I think they would do so by elevating Wisco, not dropping Stanford, and I\'m not sure that would get it done.

It\'s moot anyways because of TCU, but I personally think all this doomsday scenario talk is just hogwash- voters might not elevate us as they should, but I highly doubt they would significantly drop us.