08-25-2013, 12:03 PM
(08-25-2013, 10:24 AM)Publius link Wrote:[quote author=terry link=topic=8283.msg66379#msg66379 date=1377407082]
I think college football belongs on a college campus, in a college town.
Palo Alto is not a college town. For one glorious night back in 1991?, when a Stanford-UCLA game mattered and the most convenient way to see it was on ESPN at bars in Palo Alto, it was a college town. Other than that night, Palo Alto might as well be Wellesley, MA. That's the college-age Publius speaking. Middle-aged Publius here would love to live there: Palo Alto, not Wellesley (yuck).
That being said, I agree with the general sentiment that college football belongs on campus. But an exception to rebalance the schedule makes sense to me. And I do think it will be cool to go to a new NFL stadium just this one time.
[/quote]
I agree with that general sentiment too, although there are some schools (UCLA and San Diego State are two that jump to mind) that seem to function fine without it. I don't think an occasional exception to the rule needs to cause a brobdingnagian amount of hand wringing and angst, though.

