[stupac2]

I also think there's some serious confirmation bias going on too (or maybe extremely long memories for sins I've missed), because while he does have some weird stuff it's really not that bad. You get the same kind of weirdness from pretty much every major news source, and at least Wilner is a local reporter who actually watches and writes about the games.

Sure, he's not Drukarev, but is he really any worse than ESPN's coverage?

[stupac2]

I also think there's some serious confirmation bias going on too (or maybe extremely long memories for sins I've missed), because while he does have some weird stuff it's really not that bad. You get the same kind of weirdness from pretty much every major news source, and at least Wilner is a local reporter who actually watches and writes about the games.

Sure, he's not Drukarev, but is he really any worse than ESPN's coverage?