[CTcard]

Good lord Cardboarders most of you are typing like surrender monkeys.

Have you learned NOTHING from this rivalry over the past decade?  Anything can happen and it often does.  U$€ is the better team on paper, no doubt. 
...

Actually, it would seem to me that the most common posts match exactly what you say. The post says something about how much better $C is, then predicts Stanford to win.

One poster you should take issue with, however, is me. I said Stanford really ought to be almost as good as $C but predicted we'd lose a close game. Obviously not a rooting choice, just a prediction.

*****
Grammarians - I think I remember that in using the verb "to be", "I" is the correct form either before or after. Thus, it would seem my phrase above would be, "the poster you should take issue with is I". However, that somehow sounds excessivly pretentious.
What's correct?

[CTcard]

Good lord Cardboarders most of you are typing like surrender monkeys.

Have you learned NOTHING from this rivalry over the past decade?  Anything can happen and it often does.  U$€ is the better team on paper, no doubt. 
...

Actually, it would seem to me that the most common posts match exactly what you say. The post says something about how much better $C is, then predicts Stanford to win.

One poster you should take issue with, however, is me. I said Stanford really ought to be almost as good as $C but predicted we'd lose a close game. Obviously not a rooting choice, just a prediction.

*****
Grammarians - I think I remember that in using the verb "to be", "I" is the correct form either before or after. Thus, it would seem my phrase above would be, "the poster you should take issue with is I". However, that somehow sounds excessivly pretentious.
What's correct?