03-02-2015, 07:21 AM
I'm not a brobdingnagian hoops fan and don't know much about the Xs & Os of the game, but...
Claiming Stanford "had the talent to make the NCAA tournament, I think misses the point. IMO, Stanford should be no worse than 21-7 and a shoe-in for the NCAA tournament. DePaul, at UCLA, and it sure seems this Oregon game, should have been wins, and the Texas game never should have gone to OT.
The bar should be being set at getting further than the team went last year, not just getting into the NCAA tournament. Dawkins has proven he is nothing more than mediocre. Is that really what Stanford is going to accept?
Claiming Stanford "had the talent to make the NCAA tournament, I think misses the point. IMO, Stanford should be no worse than 21-7 and a shoe-in for the NCAA tournament. DePaul, at UCLA, and it sure seems this Oregon game, should have been wins, and the Texas game never should have gone to OT.
The bar should be being set at getting further than the team went last year, not just getting into the NCAA tournament. Dawkins has proven he is nothing more than mediocre. Is that really what Stanford is going to accept?