10-10-2015, 07:35 PM
59ers with 2 turnovers. Old Blues can consult the wikipedia page for "regression to the mean."
Week 6 in opponents
59ers with 2 turnovers. Old Blues can consult the wikipedia page for "regression to the mean."
10-10-2015, 07:36 PM
(10-10-2015, 07:35 PM)washingtonismoney link Wrote:Old Blues can consult the wikipedia page for "regression to the mean."
A bit premature for this, I think. Cal can score in bunches, and the first turnover was just a mistake by a normally sure-handed receiver.
(10-10-2015, 07:35 PM)washingtonismoney link Wrote:Old Blues can consult the wikipedia page for "regression to the mean."
A bit premature for this, I think. Cal can score in bunches, and the first turnover was just a mistake by a normally sure-handed receiver.
10-10-2015, 07:38 PM
(10-10-2015, 07:04 PM)martyup link Wrote:WSU beats Oregon in OT
![[Image: holy-schnikes.jpg]](https://shtinkyshmellyrunatriathalon.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/holy-schnikes.jpg)
How the mighty have fallen
10-10-2015, 07:50 PM
(10-10-2015, 07:36 PM)ThePassionOfTheChryst link Wrote:[quote author=washingtonismoney link=topic=13101.msg133880#msg133880 date=1444530901]
Old Blues can consult the wikipedia page for "regression to the mean."
A bit premature for this, I think. Low APR U can score in bunches, and the first turnover was just a mistake by a normally sure-handed receiver.
[/quote]
Referring specifically to their turnover record, which was clearly luck-driven.
(10-10-2015, 07:36 PM)ThePassionOfTheChryst link Wrote:[quote author=washingtonismoney link=topic=13101.msg133880#msg133880 date=1444530901]
Old Blues can consult the wikipedia page for "regression to the mean."
A bit premature for this, I think. Low APR U can score in bunches, and the first turnover was just a mistake by a normally sure-handed receiver.
[/quote]
Referring specifically to their turnover record, which was clearly luck-driven.
10-10-2015, 07:54 PM
Gonna be a long day for Cal if they can't tackle Booker. Turned a loss into a 40 yard touchdown.
BC
BC
Gonna be a long day for Cal if they can't tackle Booker. Turned a loss into a 40 yard touchdown.
BC
BC
10-10-2015, 07:57 PM
Cal has a bit to go to fully regress to the mean, but it's on its way; three turnovers in the first quarter.
BC
BC
Cal has a bit to go to fully regress to the mean, but it's on its way; three turnovers in the first quarter.
BC
BC
10-10-2015, 07:59 PM
(10-10-2015, 07:57 PM)Boston Card link Wrote:Low APR U has a bit to go to fully regress to the mean, but it's on its way; three turnovers in the first quarter.
BC
Hope the rest of that regression occurs in the 118th Big Game.
(10-10-2015, 07:57 PM)Boston Card link Wrote:Low APR U has a bit to go to fully regress to the mean, but it's on its way; three turnovers in the first quarter.
BC
Hope the rest of that regression occurs in the 118th Big Game.
10-10-2015, 08:05 PM
It's a net benefit for Stanford if Utah wins, and it's usually nice to see C.al lose, but for some reason I can't get fully onto the Utah train tonight. I want to be excited for a truly meaningful Big Game.
It's a net benefit for Stanford if Utah wins, and it's usually nice to see C.al lose, but for some reason I can't get fully onto the Utah train tonight. I want to be excited for a truly meaningful Big Game.
10-10-2015, 08:13 PM
Cal's offense is dependent on their receivers setting picks. If those start getting called, the Bears will be in trouble.
BC
BC
Cal's offense is dependent on their receivers setting picks. If those start getting called, the Bears will be in trouble.
BC
BC
Lawler is just costing Goff draft spots at this point
10-10-2015, 08:30 PM
They're unregressing....
Edit: wait, regressing again. What a sloppy game.
Edit: wait, regressing again. What a sloppy game.
They're unregressing....
Edit: wait, regressing again. What a sloppy game.
Edit: wait, regressing again. What a sloppy game.
10-10-2015, 08:32 PM
(10-10-2015, 08:25 PM)ThePassionOfTheChryst link Wrote:Lawler is just costing Goff draft spots at this point
Goff just cost himself draft spots.
(10-10-2015, 08:30 PM)CrazedZooChimp link Wrote:They're unregressing....
They're reregressing.
BC
(10-10-2015, 08:25 PM)ThePassionOfTheChryst link Wrote:Lawler is just costing Goff draft spots at this point
Goff just cost himself draft spots.
(10-10-2015, 08:30 PM)CrazedZooChimp link Wrote:They're unregressing....
They're reregressing.
BC
10-10-2015, 08:32 PM
This game is confusing me. I'm starting to understand why some people weren't buying into the Utah hype, they've been pretty bad at tackling so far, which is surprising to me. I'm also surprised by their seeming inability to run up the middle (though I missed the long TD run somehow, maybe that was better).
And as I'm writing this Wilson threw another INT. This is a sloppy game.
And as I'm writing this Wilson threw another INT. This is a sloppy game.
This game is confusing me. I'm starting to understand why some people weren't buying into the Utah hype, they've been pretty bad at tackling so far, which is surprising to me. I'm also surprised by their seeming inability to run up the middle (though I missed the long TD run somehow, maybe that was better).
And as I'm writing this Wilson threw another INT. This is a sloppy game.
And as I'm writing this Wilson threw another INT. This is a sloppy game.
10-10-2015, 08:33 PM
I boldly predict that Travis Wilson falls from his #1 ranked QBR perch after this one.
10-10-2015, 08:34 PM
(10-10-2015, 08:32 PM)stupac2 link Wrote:This game is confusing me. I'm starting to understand why some people weren't buying into the Utah hype, they've been pretty bad at tackling so far, which is surprising to me. I'm also surprised by their seeming inability to run up the middle (though I missed the long TD run somehow, maybe that was better).
And as I'm writing this Wilson threw another INT. This is a sloppy game.
Both teams have looked bad. If this wasn't a meaningful conference game I'd have changed the channel already.
(10-10-2015, 08:32 PM)stupac2 link Wrote:This game is confusing me. I'm starting to understand why some people weren't buying into the Utah hype, they've been pretty bad at tackling so far, which is surprising to me. I'm also surprised by their seeming inability to run up the middle (though I missed the long TD run somehow, maybe that was better).
And as I'm writing this Wilson threw another INT. This is a sloppy game.
Both teams have looked bad. If this wasn't a meaningful conference game I'd have changed the channel already.
10-10-2015, 08:34 PM
WTF? Rutgers spiked the ball... on fourth down. That gave Michigan State, the most overrated #4 ranked team in the country, the game.
Michigan - Michigan State next week will be interesting. I have to believe that Michigan has to be favored at home, probably by more than a touchdown.
BC
Michigan - Michigan State next week will be interesting. I have to believe that Michigan has to be favored at home, probably by more than a touchdown.
BC
WTF? Rutgers spiked the ball... on fourth down. That gave Michigan State, the most overrated #4 ranked team in the country, the game.
Michigan - Michigan State next week will be interesting. I have to believe that Michigan has to be favored at home, probably by more than a touchdown.
BC
Michigan - Michigan State next week will be interesting. I have to believe that Michigan has to be favored at home, probably by more than a touchdown.
BC
10-10-2015, 08:35 PM
I think the key for Utah is to do nothing but hand it to Booker. Who cares if Cal has 9 in the box.
I think the key for Utah is to do nothing but hand it to Booker. Who cares if Cal has 9 in the box.
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »