09-24-2015, 01:06 PM
I'm an alum, but I guess I don't rate. I never got the survey. >:(
Stanford's Next President Your Input Requested
I'm an alum, but I guess I don't rate. I never got the survey. >:(
09-24-2015, 01:08 PM
(09-24-2015, 01:06 PM)Class_of_75 link Wrote:I'm an alum, but I guess I don't rate. I never got the survey. >:(
You have to have a certain minimum number of Cardboard posts to qualify. Sorry.
“Tact is the ability to tell someone to go to Hell in such a way that they look forward to the trip." W. Churchill
(09-24-2015, 01:06 PM)Class_of_75 link Wrote:I'm an alum, but I guess I don't rate. I never got the survey. >:(
You have to have a certain minimum number of Cardboard posts to qualify. Sorry.
“Tact is the ability to tell someone to go to Hell in such a way that they look forward to the trip." W. Churchill
09-25-2015, 01:06 PM
(09-24-2015, 01:06 PM)Class_of_75 link Wrote:I'm an alum, but I guess I don't rate. I never got the survey. >:(
Did you check all your inboxes and spam boxes...?? You certainly rate higher than I do.
09-25-2015, 01:13 PM
(09-25-2015, 01:06 PM)fullmetal link Wrote:[quote author=Class_of_75 link=topic=12897.msg130350#msg130350 date=1443125210]
I'm an alum, but I guess I don't rate. I never got the survey. >:(
Did you check all your inboxes and spam boxes...?? You certainly rate higher than I do.
[/quote]
Do they have your current email address?
“Tact is the ability to tell someone to go to Hell in such a way that they look forward to the trip." W. Churchill
(09-25-2015, 01:06 PM)fullmetal link Wrote:[quote author=Class_of_75 link=topic=12897.msg130350#msg130350 date=1443125210]
I'm an alum, but I guess I don't rate. I never got the survey. >:(
Did you check all your inboxes and spam boxes...?? You certainly rate higher than I do.
[/quote]
Do they have your current email address?
“Tact is the ability to tell someone to go to Hell in such a way that they look forward to the trip." W. Churchill
09-25-2015, 02:03 PM
(09-25-2015, 01:06 PM)fullmetal link Wrote:[quote author=Class_of_75 link=topic=12897.msg130350#msg130350 date=1443125210]
I'm an alum, but I guess I don't rate. I never got the survey. >:(
Did you check all your inboxes and spam boxes...?? You certainly rate higher than I do.
[/quote]
I didn't check the spam box, but my Stanford correspondence rarely goes in there. I guess I'll have to check.
(09-25-2015, 01:06 PM)fullmetal link Wrote:[quote author=Class_of_75 link=topic=12897.msg130350#msg130350 date=1443125210]
I'm an alum, but I guess I don't rate. I never got the survey. >:(
Did you check all your inboxes and spam boxes...?? You certainly rate higher than I do.
[/quote]
I didn't check the spam box, but my Stanford correspondence rarely goes in there. I guess I'll have to check.
09-25-2015, 02:51 PM
(09-23-2015, 08:57 AM)82lsju link Wrote:[quote author=Spiny_Norman link=topic=12897.msg130155#msg130155 date=1443022526]
Would Condoleeza Rice get consideration? She has academic background plus management experience.
she probably would be considered if she was interested, but I think there are a lot of people inside the University who would not be thrilled if she got the job.
[/quote]
I would say many, many such people.
(09-23-2015, 08:57 AM)82lsju link Wrote:[quote author=Spiny_Norman link=topic=12897.msg130155#msg130155 date=1443022526]
Would Condoleeza Rice get consideration? She has academic background plus management experience.
she probably would be considered if she was interested, but I think there are a lot of people inside the University who would not be thrilled if she got the job.
[/quote]
I would say many, many such people.
09-25-2015, 04:26 PM
(09-23-2015, 05:11 AM)CTcard link Wrote:Steve Chu would seem a strong candidate whom I mentioned in my survey response (Nobel Laureate, recently Secretary of Energy) - but he might be a couple of years older than they would like.
Dear God please no. He might make Janet Incompetano look competent.
(09-23-2015, 05:11 AM)CTcard link Wrote:Steve Chu would seem a strong candidate whom I mentioned in my survey response (Nobel Laureate, recently Secretary of Energy) - but he might be a couple of years older than they would like.
Dear God please no. He might make Janet Incompetano look competent.
09-25-2015, 04:46 PM
(09-25-2015, 04:26 PM)winflop link Wrote:[quote author=CTcard link=topic=12897.msg130146#msg130146 date=1443010271]
Steve Chu would seem a strong candidate whom I mentioned in my survey response (Nobel Laureate, recently Secretary of Energy) - but he might be a couple of years older than they would like.
Dear God please no. He might make Janet Incompetano look competent.
[/quote]
I think a government/political job is very different than a University administrative job. He ran Stanford's Physics department and was part of the successful launch of the BioX interdisciplinary program. He's also run the Lawrence Berkeley National lab.
Like Condoleezza Rice, I think Chu's involvement as a cabinet member has made him a target of people who do not agree with the policies of the administrations under which they served (though they obviously served very different administrations). It is worth noting that both of them have significant academic and administrative accomplishments outside of their government service, and that their political outlook should not be disqualifying for a position as University President.
BC
(09-25-2015, 04:26 PM)winflop link Wrote:[quote author=CTcard link=topic=12897.msg130146#msg130146 date=1443010271]
Steve Chu would seem a strong candidate whom I mentioned in my survey response (Nobel Laureate, recently Secretary of Energy) - but he might be a couple of years older than they would like.
Dear God please no. He might make Janet Incompetano look competent.
[/quote]
I think a government/political job is very different than a University administrative job. He ran Stanford's Physics department and was part of the successful launch of the BioX interdisciplinary program. He's also run the Lawrence Berkeley National lab.
Like Condoleezza Rice, I think Chu's involvement as a cabinet member has made him a target of people who do not agree with the policies of the administrations under which they served (though they obviously served very different administrations). It is worth noting that both of them have significant academic and administrative accomplishments outside of their government service, and that their political outlook should not be disqualifying for a position as University President.
BC
09-25-2015, 05:14 PM
(09-25-2015, 01:26 PM)garvin link Wrote:Nah, they didn't send fullmetal a survey. I know because when I nominated him for president, I got back a nasty note saying they didn't want to have the entire endowment turned over to the crew team.
Garvin must have been drinking (a lot) if he nominated me for president. But yes, I did also get an email...I should fill out the survey at some point.
(09-25-2015, 01:26 PM)garvin link Wrote:Nah, they didn't send fullmetal a survey. I know because when I nominated him for president, I got back a nasty note saying they didn't want to have the entire endowment turned over to the crew team.
Garvin must have been drinking (a lot) if he nominated me for president. But yes, I did also get an email...I should fill out the survey at some point.
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »