[JohnR34231]

Sarrell was quoted as saying the outcome of Washington Stanford game would have no impact on his decision.

[JohnR34231]

Sarrell was quoted as saying the outcome of Washington Stanford game would have no impact on his decision.

[Hurlburt88]

Agree that is likely what he & others are told.  For three good reasons:  confirm physical readiness, confirm mental readiness, & come in with mentality of competing & striving. 

[Hurlburt88]

Agree that is likely what he & others are told.  For three good reasons:  confirm physical readiness, confirm mental readiness, & come in with mentality of competing & striving. 

[Hurlburt88]

Agree that is likely what he & others are told.  For three good reasons:  confirm physical readiness, confirm mental readiness, & come in with mentality of competing & striving. 

[Hurlburt88]

Agree that is likely what he & others are told.  For three good reasons:  confirm physical readiness, confirm mental readiness, & come in with mentality of competing & striving. 

[Row80Critic]

I think it is most likely the case the coaches tell guys they will be given opportunities to play early but they should be prepared to be eased into playing.

That said, if someone proves good enough to start, he will.

From the cheap seats, I'd say Shaw is more reluctant than most to play freshman (and, for that matter, to make personnel changes when players aren't performing well).  Seems like a freshman needs to be a near-phenom -- and significantly better than the next best upper classman -- to see meaningful game time.  Think Herbig.  We shall see.  Either way, what a great addition to the 2017 class!

[Row80Critic]

I think it is most likely the case the coaches tell guys they will be given opportunities to play early but they should be prepared to be eased into playing.

That said, if someone proves good enough to start, he will.

From the cheap seats, I'd say Shaw is more reluctant than most to play freshman (and, for that matter, to make personnel changes when players aren't performing well).  Seems like a freshman needs to be a near-phenom -- and significantly better than the next best upper classman -- to see meaningful game time.  Think Herbig.  We shall see.  Either way, what a great addition to the 2017 class!

[Row80Critic]

I think it is most likely the case the coaches tell guys they will be given opportunities to play early but they should be prepared to be eased into playing.

That said, if someone proves good enough to start, he will.

From the cheap seats, I'd say Shaw is more reluctant than most to play freshman (and, for that matter, to make personnel changes when players aren't performing well).  Seems like a freshman needs to be a near-phenom -- and significantly better than the next best upper classman -- to see meaningful game time.  Think Herbig.  We shall see.  Either way, what a great addition to the 2017 class!

[Row80Critic]

I think it is most likely the case the coaches tell guys they will be given opportunities to play early but they should be prepared to be eased into playing.

That said, if someone proves good enough to start, he will.

From the cheap seats, I'd say Shaw is more reluctant than most to play freshman (and, for that matter, to make personnel changes when players aren't performing well).  Seems like a freshman needs to be a near-phenom -- and significantly better than the next best upper classman -- to see meaningful game time.  Think Herbig.  We shall see.  Either way, what a great addition to the 2017 class!

[norcard]

[quote author=OutsiderFan link=topic=16298.msg182758#msg182758 date=1481939657]
I think it is most likely the case the coaches tell guys they will be given opportunities to play early but they should be prepared to be eased into playing.

That said, if someone proves good enough to start, he will.

From the cheap seats, I'd say Shaw is more reluctant than most to play freshman (and, for that matter, to make personnel changes when players aren't performing well).  Seems like a freshman needs to be a near-phenom -- and significantly better than the next best upper classman -- to see meaningful game time.  Think Herbig.  We shall see.  Either way, what a great addition to the 2017 class!
[/quote]

Shaw did play peat, garnett, and murphy as freshman at the same time.  So i would definitely expect significant action from little even if he is not starting

[norcard]

[quote author=OutsiderFan link=topic=16298.msg182758#msg182758 date=1481939657]
I think it is most likely the case the coaches tell guys they will be given opportunities to play early but they should be prepared to be eased into playing.

That said, if someone proves good enough to start, he will.

From the cheap seats, I'd say Shaw is more reluctant than most to play freshman (and, for that matter, to make personnel changes when players aren't performing well).  Seems like a freshman needs to be a near-phenom -- and significantly better than the next best upper classman -- to see meaningful game time.  Think Herbig.  We shall see.  Either way, what a great addition to the 2017 class!
[/quote]

Shaw did play peat, garnett, and murphy as freshman at the same time.  So i would definitely expect significant action from little even if he is not starting

[norcard]

[quote author=OutsiderFan link=topic=16298.msg182758#msg182758 date=1481939657]
I think it is most likely the case the coaches tell guys they will be given opportunities to play early but they should be prepared to be eased into playing.

That said, if someone proves good enough to start, he will.

From the cheap seats, I'd say Shaw is more reluctant than most to play freshman (and, for that matter, to make personnel changes when players aren't performing well).  Seems like a freshman needs to be a near-phenom -- and significantly better than the next best upper classman -- to see meaningful game time.  Think Herbig.  We shall see.  Either way, what a great addition to the 2017 class!
[/quote]

Shaw did play peat, garnett, and murphy as freshman at the same time.  So i would definitely expect significant action from little even if he is not starting

[norcard]

[quote author=OutsiderFan link=topic=16298.msg182758#msg182758 date=1481939657]
I think it is most likely the case the coaches tell guys they will be given opportunities to play early but they should be prepared to be eased into playing.

That said, if someone proves good enough to start, he will.

From the cheap seats, I'd say Shaw is more reluctant than most to play freshman (and, for that matter, to make personnel changes when players aren't performing well).  Seems like a freshman needs to be a near-phenom -- and significantly better than the next best upper classman -- to see meaningful game time.  Think Herbig.  We shall see.  Either way, what a great addition to the 2017 class!
[/quote]

Shaw did play peat, garnett, and murphy as freshman at the same time.  So i would definitely expect significant action from little even if he is not starting

[washingtonismoney]

I continue to be puzzled by the idea that Shaw is reluctant to play freshmen. Is there any data on this? Stanford's seen many true freshman play significant roles:

2016: Herbig
2015: Meeks, Love
2014: McCaffrey
2013: [not sure]
2012: Carter, Peat, Murphy
2011: Richards, Montgomery

So there are plenty of freshman who play at Stanford. Is this more...less... than other schools. I've got no idea! But we know plenty of freshmen play.

Next year I would expect a pretty decent number of Lund, St. Brown, Little, Parkinson, and (if they come) Wedington and Sarrel to play, and play a significant role.

[washingtonismoney]

I continue to be puzzled by the idea that Shaw is reluctant to play freshmen. Is there any data on this? Stanford's seen many true freshman play significant roles:

2016: Herbig
2015: Meeks, Love
2014: McCaffrey
2013: [not sure]
2012: Carter, Peat, Murphy
2011: Richards, Montgomery

So there are plenty of freshman who play at Stanford. Is this more...less... than other schools. I've got no idea! But we know plenty of freshmen play.

Next year I would expect a pretty decent number of Lund, St. Brown, Little, Parkinson, and (if they come) Wedington and Sarrel to play, and play a significant role.

[washingtonismoney]

I continue to be puzzled by the idea that Shaw is reluctant to play freshmen. Is there any data on this? Stanford's seen many true freshman play significant roles:

2016: Herbig
2015: Meeks, Love
2014: McCaffrey
2013: [not sure]
2012: Carter, Peat, Murphy
2011: Richards, Montgomery

So there are plenty of freshman who play at Stanford. Is this more...less... than other schools. I've got no idea! But we know plenty of freshmen play.

Next year I would expect a pretty decent number of Lund, St. Brown, Little, Parkinson, and (if they come) Wedington and Sarrel to play, and play a significant role.

[washingtonismoney]

I continue to be puzzled by the idea that Shaw is reluctant to play freshmen. Is there any data on this? Stanford's seen many true freshman play significant roles:

2016: Herbig
2015: Meeks, Love
2014: McCaffrey
2013: [not sure]
2012: Carter, Peat, Murphy
2011: Richards, Montgomery

So there are plenty of freshman who play at Stanford. Is this more...less... than other schools. I've got no idea! But we know plenty of freshmen play.

Next year I would expect a pretty decent number of Lund, St. Brown, Little, Parkinson, and (if they come) Wedington and Sarrel to play, and play a significant role.

[Row80Critic]

I continue to be puzzled by the idea that Shaw is reluctant to play freshmen. Is there any data on this? Stanford's seen many true freshman play significant roles:

2016: Herbig
2015: Meeks, Love
2014: McCaffrey
2013: [not sure]
2012: Carter, Peat, Murphy
2011: Richards, Montgomery

So there are plenty of freshman who play at Stanford. Is this more...less... than other schools. I've got no idea! But we know plenty of freshmen play.

Next year I would expect a pretty decent number of Lund, St. Brown, Little, Parkinson, and (if they come) Wedington and Sarrel to play, and play a significant role.

Here's a slightly dated glimpse...

http://www.espn.com/blog/sec/post/_/id/8...shmen-most

[Row80Critic]

I continue to be puzzled by the idea that Shaw is reluctant to play freshmen. Is there any data on this? Stanford's seen many true freshman play significant roles:

2016: Herbig
2015: Meeks, Love
2014: McCaffrey
2013: [not sure]
2012: Carter, Peat, Murphy
2011: Richards, Montgomery

So there are plenty of freshman who play at Stanford. Is this more...less... than other schools. I've got no idea! But we know plenty of freshmen play.

Next year I would expect a pretty decent number of Lund, St. Brown, Little, Parkinson, and (if they come) Wedington and Sarrel to play, and play a significant role.

Here's a slightly dated glimpse...

http://www.espn.com/blog/sec/post/_/id/8...shmen-most

[Row80Critic]

I continue to be puzzled by the idea that Shaw is reluctant to play freshmen. Is there any data on this? Stanford's seen many true freshman play significant roles:

2016: Herbig
2015: Meeks, Love
2014: McCaffrey
2013: [not sure]
2012: Carter, Peat, Murphy
2011: Richards, Montgomery

So there are plenty of freshman who play at Stanford. Is this more...less... than other schools. I've got no idea! But we know plenty of freshmen play.

Next year I would expect a pretty decent number of Lund, St. Brown, Little, Parkinson, and (if they come) Wedington and Sarrel to play, and play a significant role.

Here's a slightly dated glimpse...

http://www.espn.com/blog/sec/post/_/id/8...shmen-most

[Row80Critic]

I continue to be puzzled by the idea that Shaw is reluctant to play freshmen. Is there any data on this? Stanford's seen many true freshman play significant roles:

2016: Herbig
2015: Meeks, Love
2014: McCaffrey
2013: [not sure]
2012: Carter, Peat, Murphy
2011: Richards, Montgomery

So there are plenty of freshman who play at Stanford. Is this more...less... than other schools. I've got no idea! But we know plenty of freshmen play.

Next year I would expect a pretty decent number of Lund, St. Brown, Little, Parkinson, and (if they come) Wedington and Sarrel to play, and play a significant role.

Here's a slightly dated glimpse...

http://www.espn.com/blog/sec/post/_/id/8...shmen-most

[larkinforever]

Sarrell was quoted as saying the outcome of Washington Stanford game would have no impact on his decision.

One might wonder, however, if the current CFP rankings (UW #4, Stanford #18), or the CFP semi-finals/finals or the Sun Bowl will have any impact (whether stated or not). 

[larkinforever]

Sarrell was quoted as saying the outcome of Washington Stanford game would have no impact on his decision.

One might wonder, however, if the current CFP rankings (UW #4, Stanford #18), or the CFP semi-finals/finals or the Sun Bowl will have any impact (whether stated or not). 

[larkinforever]

Sarrell was quoted as saying the outcome of Washington Stanford game would have no impact on his decision.

One might wonder, however, if the current CFP rankings (UW #4, Stanford #18), or the CFP semi-finals/finals or the Sun Bowl will have any impact (whether stated or not). 

[larkinforever]

Sarrell was quoted as saying the outcome of Washington Stanford game would have no impact on his decision.

One might wonder, however, if the current CFP rankings (UW #4, Stanford #18), or the CFP semi-finals/finals or the Sun Bowl will have any impact (whether stated or not). 

[JohnR34231]

[quote author=JPRI link=topic=11701.msg182765#msg182765 date=1481970112]
Sarrell was quoted as saying the outcome of Washington Stanford game would have no impact on his decision.

One might wonder, however, if the current CFP rankings (UW #4, Stanford #18), or the CFP semi-finals/finals or the Sun Bowl will have any impact (whether stated or not).
[/quote]

Hey, you never know. The fact that Washington has seemingly morphed from a conference also ran to a conference power under Petersen's tutelage quite possibly could affect Sarrell's decision. If there is one thing consistent about a recruit's selection of a school it is that he always wants to go play for a winner.

[JohnR34231]

[quote author=JPRI link=topic=11701.msg182765#msg182765 date=1481970112]
Sarrell was quoted as saying the outcome of Washington Stanford game would have no impact on his decision.

One might wonder, however, if the current CFP rankings (UW #4, Stanford #18), or the CFP semi-finals/finals or the Sun Bowl will have any impact (whether stated or not).
[/quote]

Hey, you never know. The fact that Washington has seemingly morphed from a conference also ran to a conference power under Petersen's tutelage quite possibly could affect Sarrell's decision. If there is one thing consistent about a recruit's selection of a school it is that he always wants to go play for a winner.

[JohnR34231]

[quote author=JPRI link=topic=11701.msg182765#msg182765 date=1481970112]
Sarrell was quoted as saying the outcome of Washington Stanford game would have no impact on his decision.

One might wonder, however, if the current CFP rankings (UW #4, Stanford #18), or the CFP semi-finals/finals or the Sun Bowl will have any impact (whether stated or not).
[/quote]

Hey, you never know. The fact that Washington has seemingly morphed from a conference also ran to a conference power under Petersen's tutelage quite possibly could affect Sarrell's decision. If there is one thing consistent about a recruit's selection of a school it is that he always wants to go play for a winner.

[JohnR34231]

[quote author=JPRI link=topic=11701.msg182765#msg182765 date=1481970112]
Sarrell was quoted as saying the outcome of Washington Stanford game would have no impact on his decision.

One might wonder, however, if the current CFP rankings (UW #4, Stanford #18), or the CFP semi-finals/finals or the Sun Bowl will have any impact (whether stated or not).
[/quote]

Hey, you never know. The fact that Washington has seemingly morphed from a conference also ran to a conference power under Petersen's tutelage quite possibly could affect Sarrell's decision. If there is one thing consistent about a recruit's selection of a school it is that he always wants to go play for a winner.

[OutsiderFan]

You can also add that recruits make choices based on who else is in their class. 

[OutsiderFan]

You can also add that recruits make choices based on who else is in their class. 

[OutsiderFan]

You can also add that recruits make choices based on who else is in their class. 

[OutsiderFan]

You can also add that recruits make choices based on who else is in their class. 

[ThePassionOfTheChryst]

The proportions of the Little commitment are exceedingly large indeed.

[ThePassionOfTheChryst]

The proportions of the Little commitment are exceedingly large indeed.

[ThePassionOfTheChryst]

The proportions of the Little commitment are exceedingly large indeed.

[ThePassionOfTheChryst]

The proportions of the Little commitment are exceedingly large indeed.

[CornFed]

6' 8" and 320 lbs.!!!!!!!    8) :P

[CornFed]

6' 8" and 320 lbs.!!!!!!!    8) :P