I think these stats are so skewed by the h
uge applicant pools out there that results from the cut 'n paste Common Application process are virtually meaningless. Other than a sandstone campus (some admittedly faux) with red tile roofs (probably most of these are real and spectacular just like Teri Hatcher) a mere five miles from the climate deemed best by government test draws a boatload of applicants. And they don't take many. But there are more applicants because applying is easier than ever. So yes, Stanford is more selective, but it is mostly a function of the denominator. I think anyway.
In 1980 I applied to three schools (University of Colorado, Colorado School of Mines, and Georgia Tech) and had offers of admission from all three before Christmas.
In 2008 my daughter applied to three schools (University of Portland, Sonoma State, and U of Southern Oregon) and had the same experience. She was
very unusual for her class, and had a not-so-mild panic attack the following spring when all of her friends who had applied to a dozen schools started hearing back from them and my daughter realized that she only looked at three, and aaaah....... Relax honey.
In 2011 my son applied to thirteen schools, a baker's dozen from around the country, because the applications were all free (that's one way for a university to increase its 'selectivity' without doing a d
amn thing else), he was gaming NROTC a little bit. and it all made for a nice long road trip to visit a zillion schools in the eastern humid zone (EHZ) that summer. Ultimately he was offered scholarships at 11 of those schools and we found out that it is easier to get in at Annapolis than C
al, although conventional wisdom and all the indices say otherwise. But the letter don't lie as they say.
Face it, a few of us would get in now; a lot of us wouldn't. Just like the 40,000 applicants this year. I'd love some inside scoop. I bet it involves more than a little.....