03-26-2014, 09:28 AM
Great stuff, Burger! Thanks for finding it. :D
(03-26-2014, 09:34 AM)garvin link Wrote:At the end of the 1971 season -- my freshman year -- the Band announced that it was capping itself at its current size and for the first time in the modern (post-1963) history of the LSJUMB, it would henceforth conduct tryouts. Not only was the Band at peak popularity (we had just won two consecutive Rose Bowls), but the University was requiring it to accept women for the first time. This was all big news at the time, covered extensively by the Daily.
The number 186 sticks in my mind as the cap, and if it's not precisely correct, it's certainly in the ballpark. There were definitely some students who didn't make the cut in 1972; I remember some of the Band guys in Roble talking at dinner about the dejection of the rejected. Whether meaningful tryouts (as opposed to the sort of placement tryouts Viking Guy describes) were necessary after that, I don't recall.
(03-26-2014, 09:34 AM)garvin link Wrote:At the end of the 1971 season -- my freshman year -- the Band announced that it was capping itself at its current size and for the first time in the modern (post-1963) history of the LSJUMB, it would henceforth conduct tryouts. Not only was the Band at peak popularity (we had just won two consecutive Rose Bowls), but the University was requiring it to accept women for the first time. This was all big news at the time, covered extensively by the Daily.
The number 186 sticks in my mind as the cap, and if it's not precisely correct, it's certainly in the ballpark. There were definitely some students who didn't make the cut in 1972; I remember some of the Band guys in Roble talking at dinner about the dejection of the rejected. Whether meaningful tryouts (as opposed to the sort of placement tryouts Viking Guy describes) were necessary after that, I don't recall.
(03-26-2014, 10:39 AM)teejers1 link Wrote:144 was the number for LSJUMB in early '80s, and there were tryouts for all sections (including brass).
At nadir, LSJUMB dropped below 100 musicians and you just cannot project any sound with so few players. The reason why I enjoy alumni games (even though I don't participate with LSJUMB) is because the numbers get close to 200 and the sound is so much better.
(03-26-2014, 10:39 AM)teejers1 link Wrote:144 was the number for LSJUMB in early '80s, and there were tryouts for all sections (including brass).
At nadir, LSJUMB dropped below 100 musicians and you just cannot project any sound with so few players. The reason why I enjoy alumni games (even though I don't participate with LSJUMB) is because the numbers get close to 200 and the sound is so much better.
(03-26-2014, 11:09 AM)garvin link Wrote:I sort of wonder about the claim that "older" alumni don't like the LSJUMB. When I was a student, and the vast majority of alums had gone to school in the 1950s or earlier and were accustomed to a traditional Sousa-playing marching band, that was unquestionably true. But these days the vast, vast majority of alumni knew this version of the Band when they were students. I have a hard time believing they're grumpy about it.
At my reunions, the only complaint I hear is that an increasing percentage of the music it plays is unfamiliar to us, but that's said with wistfulness about the implications rather than anger at the LSJUMB. Of course we would rather hear Rag Doll and Yellow River rather than Green Day or Phish, but we realize we're not the target demo.
(03-26-2014, 11:09 AM)garvin link Wrote:I sort of wonder about the claim that "older" alumni don't like the LSJUMB. When I was a student, and the vast majority of alums had gone to school in the 1950s or earlier and were accustomed to a traditional Sousa-playing marching band, that was unquestionably true. But these days the vast, vast majority of alumni knew this version of the Band when they were students. I have a hard time believing they're grumpy about it.
At my reunions, the only complaint I hear is that an increasing percentage of the music it plays is unfamiliar to us, but that's said with wistfulness about the implications rather than anger at the LSJUMB. Of course we would rather hear Rag Doll and Yellow River rather than Green Day or Phish, but we realize we're not the target demo.
(03-26-2014, 11:09 AM)garvin link Wrote:At my reunions, the only complaint I hear is that an increasing percentage of the music it plays is unfamiliar to us, but that's said with wistfulness about the implications rather than anger at the LSJUMB. Of course we would rather hear Rag Doll and Yellow River rather than Green Day or Phish, but we realize we're not the target demo.
(03-26-2014, 11:09 AM)garvin link Wrote:At my reunions, the only complaint I hear is that an increasing percentage of the music it plays is unfamiliar to us, but that's said with wistfulness about the implications rather than anger at the LSJUMB. Of course we would rather hear Rag Doll and Yellow River rather than Green Day or Phish, but we realize we're not the target demo.