12-10-2020, 05:26 PM
(This post was last modified: 12-10-2020, 05:26 PM by TinderForMidgets.)
[Tweet]https://twitter.com/pac12/status/1337181709683445765[/Tweet]
(12-10-2020, 06:36 PM)BostonCard Wrote: It means that we can't wind up the second place team in the P12N. If we beat OSU, we will wind up 3-2, tied with Oregon (who will have beaten us head-to-head) and behind 3-1 Washington.Are all of the Pac-12 South teams ready to go?
BC
(12-10-2020, 06:36 PM)BostonCard Wrote: It means that we can't wind up the second place team in the P12N. If we beat OSU, we will wind up 3-2, tied with Oregon (who will have beaten us head-to-head) and behind 3-1 Washington.Are all of the Pac-12 South teams ready to go?
BC
(12-10-2020, 06:06 PM)OutsiderFan Wrote: It's a no contest. Washington wins the North.
So Stanford at least beat the North champion in 2020.
And Stanford probably beats Colorado if Mills wasn't screwed out of playing against Oregon and practicing for Colorado.
Of course, Oregon, never even had a chance.
(12-10-2020, 06:06 PM)OutsiderFan Wrote: It's a no contest. Washington wins the North.
So Stanford at least beat the North champion in 2020.
And Stanford probably beats Colorado if Mills wasn't screwed out of playing against Oregon and practicing for Colorado.
Of course, Oregon, never even had a chance.
(12-10-2020, 08:51 PM)farmfanucdgrad Wrote:(12-10-2020, 06:06 PM)OutsiderFan Wrote: It's a no contest. Washington wins the North.
So Stanford at least beat the North champion in 2020.
And Stanford probably beats Colorado if Mills wasn't screwed out of playing against Oregon and practicing for Colorado.
Of course, Oregon, never even had a chance.
And if Washington doesn't have enough players (as per Pac 12 Covid Protocols) to play next week? Then what?
(12-10-2020, 08:51 PM)farmfanucdgrad Wrote:(12-10-2020, 06:06 PM)OutsiderFan Wrote: It's a no contest. Washington wins the North.
So Stanford at least beat the North champion in 2020.
And Stanford probably beats Colorado if Mills wasn't screwed out of playing against Oregon and practicing for Colorado.
Of course, Oregon, never even had a chance.
And if Washington doesn't have enough players (as per Pac 12 Covid Protocols) to play next week? Then what?
(12-10-2020, 05:54 PM)farmfanucdgrad Wrote: Which means exactly what? No north division champion? Or more likely USC vs Colorado (as top 2 ranked programs) for the Championship if there is no Pac 12 North Champion now? Interesting dilemma to say the least. I believe it's now 11 games this week cxld...that's depressing yet predictable.
(12-10-2020, 10:46 PM)CardinalSagehen Wrote:(12-10-2020, 08:51 PM)farmfanucdgrad Wrote:(12-10-2020, 06:06 PM)OutsiderFan Wrote: It's a no contest. Washington wins the North.
So Stanford at least beat the North champion in 2020.
And Stanford probably beats Colorado if Mills wasn't screwed out of playing against Oregon and practicing for Colorado.
Of course, Oregon, never even had a chance.
And if Washington doesn't have enough players (as per Pac 12 Covid Protocols) to play next week? Then what?
The Pac 12 has stated that the runner-up would take their place, which turns out to be Oregon. That's the story for now, unless they change course and put USC and CU in the CCG together.
Wilner has speculated that the two runners-up in the North and South will be scheduled to play each other in the same location as the CCG. In case one of the division champs finds out it can't play with short notice, the runner-up could take their place.
This back-up spot could have included Stanford - we would have been assured second place with a win at OSU, as long as there was a loser of the UW-Oregon game. Now there won't be a loser, and we'll be third-place at best.
If Washington knows it can't play next weekend ahead of time, then presumably Stanford might still be in the #2 spot at the CCG location. But that seems like such a stretch. In addition, we've already played CU (assuming they're #2 in the South), so it might be better just to have the opportunity to play the #3 team in the South, UCLA.
(12-10-2020, 05:54 PM)farmfanucdgrad Wrote: Which means exactly what? No north division champion? Or more likely USC vs Colorado (as top 2 ranked programs) for the Championship if there is no Pac 12 North Champion now? Interesting dilemma to say the least. I believe it's now 11 games this week cxld...that's depressing yet predictable.
(12-10-2020, 10:46 PM)CardinalSagehen Wrote:(12-10-2020, 08:51 PM)farmfanucdgrad Wrote:(12-10-2020, 06:06 PM)OutsiderFan Wrote: It's a no contest. Washington wins the North.
So Stanford at least beat the North champion in 2020.
And Stanford probably beats Colorado if Mills wasn't screwed out of playing against Oregon and practicing for Colorado.
Of course, Oregon, never even had a chance.
And if Washington doesn't have enough players (as per Pac 12 Covid Protocols) to play next week? Then what?
The Pac 12 has stated that the runner-up would take their place, which turns out to be Oregon. That's the story for now, unless they change course and put USC and CU in the CCG together.
Wilner has speculated that the two runners-up in the North and South will be scheduled to play each other in the same location as the CCG. In case one of the division champs finds out it can't play with short notice, the runner-up could take their place.
This back-up spot could have included Stanford - we would have been assured second place with a win at OSU, as long as there was a loser of the UW-Oregon game. Now there won't be a loser, and we'll be third-place at best.
If Washington knows it can't play next weekend ahead of time, then presumably Stanford might still be in the #2 spot at the CCG location. But that seems like such a stretch. In addition, we've already played CU (assuming they're #2 in the South), so it might be better just to have the opportunity to play the #3 team in the South, UCLA.