03-30-2020, 03:58 PM
(03-30-2020, 09:47 AM)murky Wrote: Does mouthwash prevent the spread of disease?
The kind I use does...
Audaces fortuna iuvat
(03-28-2020, 07:05 AM)Mick Wrote: Doesn't surprise me Detroit is getting hit hard. Not a hygienic city, based upon my observations during the four years that I lived there. And their governor is an idiot.
(03-28-2020, 07:05 AM)Mick Wrote: Doesn't surprise me Detroit is getting hit hard. Not a hygienic city, based upon my observations during the four years that I lived there. And their governor is an idiot.
(04-04-2020, 11:32 PM)2006alum Wrote:(03-28-2020, 07:05 AM)Mick Wrote: Doesn't surprise me Detroit is getting hit hard. Not a hygienic city, based upon my observations during the four years that I lived there. And their governor is an idiot.
Mick's vague non-public aspersions notwithstanding, I did not find Whitmer to come off like an idiot in this interview, and she seemed more than measured in responding to questions about how Trump has treated her and in calling for cooperation between the states and the federal government.
And at a minimum, Mick, if you think think she's an idiot, I can't imagine what you must think of the guy running the daily national press briefings. At least she knows how to finish a sentence.
(04-04-2020, 11:32 PM)2006alum Wrote:(03-28-2020, 07:05 AM)Mick Wrote: Doesn't surprise me Detroit is getting hit hard. Not a hygienic city, based upon my observations during the four years that I lived there. And their governor is an idiot.
Mick's vague non-public aspersions notwithstanding, I did not find Whitmer to come off like an idiot in this interview, and she seemed more than measured in responding to questions about how Trump has treated her and in calling for cooperation between the states and the federal government.
And at a minimum, Mick, if you think think she's an idiot, I can't imagine what you must think of the guy running the daily national press briefings. At least she knows how to finish a sentence.
(04-05-2020, 06:42 AM)Mick Wrote: And don't you find it remotely interesting that Whitmer doesn't mention her brief employment between law school and running for office at age 29? It's not on her bio, it's not even on her official Wikipedia page. Nor does she mention her brief return to said employment when she term-limited out?
(04-05-2020, 06:42 AM)Mick Wrote: And don't you find it remotely interesting that Whitmer doesn't mention her brief employment between law school and running for office at age 29? It's not on her bio, it's not even on her official Wikipedia page. Nor does she mention her brief return to said employment when she term-limited out?
(04-05-2020, 11:51 AM)g1313 Wrote:(04-05-2020, 06:42 AM)Mick Wrote: And don't you find it remotely interesting that Whitmer doesn't mention her brief employment between law school and running for office at age 29? It's not on her bio, it's not even on her official Wikipedia page. Nor does she mention her brief return to said employment when she term-limited out?
What was her job?
Quote:She had dreams of becoming a sports reporter for ESPN and appears in her high school yearbook as "the budding broadcaster" of the school.
"I grew up going to football games with my dad and we were just sports fanatics," she said. "I love sports and I thought there were so few women who were in sports broadcasting."
But while getting a bachelor's degree in communications at Michigan State University, she did an internship with state Rep. Curtis Hertel, D-Detroit, when the House of Representatives was split 55-55 between Democrats and Republicans.
"It changed everything for me," she said. "I saw how important it was that we all have a voice during the debates."
So instead of using her degree to get a job at a local television station and maybe work her way up to ESPN, Whitmer went to MSU's law school and got a law degree.
"I got some really good advice when a friend said there are so few people who actually make it on air. And bringing a legal degree allows you to bring something more to the table," Whitmer said. "But I loved law school and never looked back."
Right out of law school, she got a job with the Dickinson Wright law firm in Lansing, working on cases dealing with the regulation of utilities as well as doing some legal work for the Funeral Director's Association. It wasn't exactly exciting work, but it led her back to what really sparked her interest: public service.
(04-05-2020, 11:51 AM)g1313 Wrote:(04-05-2020, 06:42 AM)Mick Wrote: And don't you find it remotely interesting that Whitmer doesn't mention her brief employment between law school and running for office at age 29? It's not on her bio, it's not even on her official Wikipedia page. Nor does she mention her brief return to said employment when she term-limited out?
What was her job?
Quote:She had dreams of becoming a sports reporter for ESPN and appears in her high school yearbook as "the budding broadcaster" of the school.
"I grew up going to football games with my dad and we were just sports fanatics," she said. "I love sports and I thought there were so few women who were in sports broadcasting."
But while getting a bachelor's degree in communications at Michigan State University, she did an internship with state Rep. Curtis Hertel, D-Detroit, when the House of Representatives was split 55-55 between Democrats and Republicans.
"It changed everything for me," she said. "I saw how important it was that we all have a voice during the debates."
So instead of using her degree to get a job at a local television station and maybe work her way up to ESPN, Whitmer went to MSU's law school and got a law degree.
"I got some really good advice when a friend said there are so few people who actually make it on air. And bringing a legal degree allows you to bring something more to the table," Whitmer said. "But I loved law school and never looked back."
Right out of law school, she got a job with the Dickinson Wright law firm in Lansing, working on cases dealing with the regulation of utilities as well as doing some legal work for the Funeral Director's Association. It wasn't exactly exciting work, but it led her back to what really sparked her interest: public service.
(03-28-2020, 07:51 AM)burger Wrote: What's Whitmer done wrong?
(03-28-2020, 07:51 AM)burger Wrote: What's Whitmer done wrong?
(10-03-2020, 07:50 AM)Mick Wrote:(03-28-2020, 07:51 AM)burger Wrote: What's Whitmer done wrong?
The good guv'nor apparently doesn't understand how the Emergency Acts apply. Quelle surprise.
https://www.mlive.com/public-interest/20...rules.html
(10-03-2020, 07:50 AM)Mick Wrote:(03-28-2020, 07:51 AM)burger Wrote: What's Whitmer done wrong?
The good guv'nor apparently doesn't understand how the Emergency Acts apply. Quelle surprise.
https://www.mlive.com/public-interest/20...rules.html
(10-03-2020, 07:50 AM)Mick Wrote:(03-28-2020, 07:51 AM)burger Wrote: What's Whitmer done wrong?
The good guv'nor apparently doesn't understand how the Emergency Acts apply. Quelle surprise.
https://www.mlive.com/public-interest/20...rules.html
(10-03-2020, 07:50 AM)Mick Wrote:(03-28-2020, 07:51 AM)burger Wrote: What's Whitmer done wrong?
The good guv'nor apparently doesn't understand how the Emergency Acts apply. Quelle surprise.
https://www.mlive.com/public-interest/20...rules.html
(10-08-2020, 10:41 AM)DenverCard Wrote: 2006 Alum: You've been way to scarce recently. I've missed your impressive range from the scathing to the wry humor. Don't let work or family take you away from where you're most needed -- here at the board.
(10-08-2020, 10:41 AM)DenverCard Wrote: 2006 Alum: You've been way to scarce recently. I've missed your impressive range from the scathing to the wry humor. Don't let work or family take you away from where you're most needed -- here at the board.
(10-09-2020, 09:10 AM)oldalum Wrote: interesting column in the NY Times yesterday about one thing about the second amendment that is actually clear and settled law is that private militias are not authorized or protected by the second amendment. I was convinced (which should sway exactly no one) articleI've always thought the 'well regulated militia' language in the Second Amendment was the open sesame to sensible gun regulation.
(10-09-2020, 09:10 AM)oldalum Wrote: interesting column in the NY Times yesterday about one thing about the second amendment that is actually clear and settled law is that private militias are not authorized or protected by the second amendment. I was convinced (which should sway exactly no one) articleI've always thought the 'well regulated militia' language in the Second Amendment was the open sesame to sensible gun regulation.
(10-09-2020, 09:28 AM)Genuine Realist Wrote: I've always thought the 'well regulated militia' language in the Second Amendment was the open sesame to sensible gun regulation.yes, that's the clause that is ignored by those who believe the Second Amendment bans all gun regulation. The NY Times article is debunking the concept that apparently some militia members have that the mention of militias in the Amendment means they are OK or even constitutionally protected. Another example of my point in an earlier thread that some people interpret the constitution as meaning what they want it to mean.
(10-09-2020, 09:28 AM)Genuine Realist Wrote: I've always thought the 'well regulated militia' language in the Second Amendment was the open sesame to sensible gun regulation.yes, that's the clause that is ignored by those who believe the Second Amendment bans all gun regulation. The NY Times article is debunking the concept that apparently some militia members have that the mention of militias in the Amendment means they are OK or even constitutionally protected. Another example of my point in an earlier thread that some people interpret the constitution as meaning what they want it to mean.