(12-30-2017, 02:58 PM)washingtonismoney link Wrote:[quote author=CornFed link=topic=18444.msg219861#msg219861 date=1514670742]
[quote author=washingtonismoney link=topic=18444.msg219851#msg219851 date=1514661531]
"Eye test" = "something I observe which I refuse to allow any external evidence to contradict"
And statistics in isolation are for people lacking a "feel" for the game (momentum, emotion, sense of something "weird" going on). I would suggest that properly using statistical input involves realtime assessment of what is unfolding, i.e. "the eye test". Or perhaps those who dismiss "the eye test" categorically feel that ultimately play-calling can be done w/ an algorithm.
[/quote]
Oh, I don't dismiss the eye test. I dismiss teejers' use of the eye test, which is a mysterious test that involves discounting some statistics, using others, invoking mysterious principles, and coming to the conclusion that David Shaw's bad offensive coaching caused the sinking of the Lusitania.
[/quote]
How dare you imply that David Shaw's offensive coaching caused the sinking of the Lusitania when any combination of sight test, smell test, taste test, hearing test, touch test and sixth sense test clearly indicate that the sinking of the Lusitania, Andrea Doria and Titanic resulted from a combination of Wlat Harris' heinously poor coaching and interpersonal skills and Buddy Teevens' general amiability and lack of cranial capacity?