[Hulk01]

Impressive, it seems:

[Hulk01]

Impressive, it seems:

[TrumpCard]

Here's a stat that doesn't require a chart:
Stanford has scored more points in each game than in the last game.
It is a trend that has to stop eventually, but it is marvelous while it lasts.
6, 31, 41, 42, 55, 56

[TrumpCard]

Here's a stat that doesn't require a chart:
Stanford has scored more points in each game than in the last game.
It is a trend that has to stop eventually, but it is marvelous while it lasts.
6, 31, 41, 42, 55, 56

[fullmetal]

We could be in TCU/Baylor territory if we wanted...!

[fullmetal]

We could be in TCU/Baylor territory if we wanted...!

[BostonCard]

When was the last time the Stanford offense scored forty points in four consecutive games?

BC

[BostonCard]

When was the last time the Stanford offense scored forty points in four consecutive games?

BC

[TrumpCard]

In 2011, Stanford did it in 5 straight games.
http://www.gostanford.com/SportSelect.db...EASON=2011

[TrumpCard]

In 2011, Stanford did it in 5 straight games.
http://www.gostanford.com/SportSelect.db...EASON=2011

[BostonCard]

In 2011, Stanford did it in 5 straight games.
http://www.gostanford.com/SportSelect.db...EASON=2011

Nope, I got you with the trick question.  The middle game against Washington State was won 44-14, but the offense only scored 37.  Ty Montgomery returned a kickoff for a touchdown.

BC

[BostonCard]

In 2011, Stanford did it in 5 straight games.
http://www.gostanford.com/SportSelect.db...EASON=2011

Nope, I got you with the trick question.  The middle game against Washington State was won 44-14, but the offense only scored 37.  Ty Montgomery returned a kickoff for a touchdown.

BC

[stupac2]

[quote author=TrumpCard link=topic=13201.msg135124#msg135124 date=1445032777]
In 2011, Stanford did it in 5 straight games.
http://www.gostanford.com/SportSelect.db...EASON=2011

Nope, I got you with the trick question.  The middle game against Washington State was won 44-14, but the offense only scored 37.  Ty Montgomery returned a kickoff for a touchdown.

BC
[/quote]

Well if you want to play that game we've only scored >40 on offense in two games. PATs/FGs are special teams.

[stupac2]

[quote author=TrumpCard link=topic=13201.msg135124#msg135124 date=1445032777]
In 2011, Stanford did it in 5 straight games.
http://www.gostanford.com/SportSelect.db...EASON=2011

Nope, I got you with the trick question.  The middle game against Washington State was won 44-14, but the offense only scored 37.  Ty Montgomery returned a kickoff for a touchdown.

BC
[/quote]

Well if you want to play that game we've only scored >40 on offense in two games. PATs/FGs are special teams.

[CompSci87]

Impressive, it seems:

tiffs don't display well, at least in the browsers I use.  Can you do png, gif, or jpg instead?

[CompSci87]

Impressive, it seems:

tiffs don't display well, at least in the browsers I use.  Can you do png, gif, or jpg instead?

[Hank 91]

Here's a stat that doesn't require a chart:
Stanford has scored more points in each game than in the last game.
It is a trend that has to stop eventually, but it is marvelous while it lasts.
6, 31, 41, 42, 55, 56

I'd love to know what the record for this might be. If we can score in the sixties against Washington, that might motivate ESPN's research department to investigate.

[Hank 91]

Here's a stat that doesn't require a chart:
Stanford has scored more points in each game than in the last game.
It is a trend that has to stop eventually, but it is marvelous while it lasts.
6, 31, 41, 42, 55, 56

I'd love to know what the record for this might be. If we can score in the sixties against Washington, that might motivate ESPN's research department to investigate.

[winflop]

Here's a stat that doesn't require a chart:
Stanford has scored more points in each game than in the last game.
It is a trend that has to stop eventually, but it is marvelous while it lasts.
6, 31, 41, 42, 55, 56

56 in THREE QUARTERS!

[winflop]

Here's a stat that doesn't require a chart:
Stanford has scored more points in each game than in the last game.
It is a trend that has to stop eventually, but it is marvelous while it lasts.
6, 31, 41, 42, 55, 56

56 in THREE QUARTERS!

[Stymie]

Looks like an asymptotic series to me, approaching the 60 point line.  That's OK by me.....

[Stymie]

Looks like an asymptotic series to me, approaching the 60 point line.  That's OK by me.....

[ThePassionOfTheChryst]

[quote author=TrumpCard link=topic=13201.msg134994#msg134994 date=1445015177]
Here's a stat that doesn't require a chart:
Stanford has scored more points in each game than in the last game.
It is a trend that has to stop eventually, but it is marvelous while it lasts.
6, 31, 41, 42, 55, 56

56 in THREE QUARTERS!
[/quote]

I very much would have liked to see just how lopsided the final would have been had Stanford kept its foot on the gas.  70 points was within reach I think.

That's hypothetical, of course.  Here in the real world I'm 100% behind the decision to yank the starters. 

[ThePassionOfTheChryst]

[quote author=TrumpCard link=topic=13201.msg134994#msg134994 date=1445015177]
Here's a stat that doesn't require a chart:
Stanford has scored more points in each game than in the last game.
It is a trend that has to stop eventually, but it is marvelous while it lasts.
6, 31, 41, 42, 55, 56

56 in THREE QUARTERS!
[/quote]

I very much would have liked to see just how lopsided the final would have been had Stanford kept its foot on the gas.  70 points was within reach I think.

That's hypothetical, of course.  Here in the real world I'm 100% behind the decision to yank the starters. 

[JohnR34231]

[quote author=winflop link=topic=13201.msg135206#msg135206 date=1445056555]
[quote author=TrumpCard link=topic=13201.msg134994#msg134994 date=1445015177]
Here's a stat that doesn't require a chart:
Stanford has scored more points in each game than in the last game.
It is a trend that has to stop eventually, but it is marvelous while it lasts.
6, 31, 41, 42, 55, 56

56 in THREE QUARTERS!
[/quote]

I very much would have liked to see just how lopsided the final would have been had Stanford kept its foot on the gas.  70 points was within reach I think.

That's hypothetical, of course.  Here in the real world I'm 100% behind the decision to yank the starters.
[/quote]

Shaw is already getting criticized for not yanking the starters (particularly CMac and Hogan) soon enough. I'm Ok with it, too, though, not so fondly remembering that ASU game a couple of years ago. It takes opposing offenses all of 2-3 minutes (sometimes less) to put up TD's against the second stringers, and when your second string offense immediately turns the ball back over to them a 3-4 touchdown lead can disappear pretty fast.

[JohnR34231]

[quote author=winflop link=topic=13201.msg135206#msg135206 date=1445056555]
[quote author=TrumpCard link=topic=13201.msg134994#msg134994 date=1445015177]
Here's a stat that doesn't require a chart:
Stanford has scored more points in each game than in the last game.
It is a trend that has to stop eventually, but it is marvelous while it lasts.
6, 31, 41, 42, 55, 56

56 in THREE QUARTERS!
[/quote]

I very much would have liked to see just how lopsided the final would have been had Stanford kept its foot on the gas.  70 points was within reach I think.

That's hypothetical, of course.  Here in the real world I'm 100% behind the decision to yank the starters.
[/quote]

Shaw is already getting criticized for not yanking the starters (particularly CMac and Hogan) soon enough. I'm Ok with it, too, though, not so fondly remembering that ASU game a couple of years ago. It takes opposing offenses all of 2-3 minutes (sometimes less) to put up TD's against the second stringers, and when your second string offense immediately turns the ball back over to them a 3-4 touchdown lead can disappear pretty fast.