[washingtonismoney]

Is Michigan really a better job than UCLA?  Maybe Michigan pays more, there is more interest, and the culture is more demanding for a winner, but from a recruiting standpoint, it's tough to argue Michigan is better.

Big Ten is probably easier than the Pac-12.

Peak UCLA is below peak SC; peak Michigan is equal to peak OSU and better than peak #3 Big Ten.

Recruiting is definitely better in Michignan than UCLA, at least if you go by recruiting rankings; Hoke has always trounced Mora.

And, of course, money. It always surprises me that people downplay this in sports circles when they would rarely casually disregard it in "real life," if you will.

[washingtonismoney]

Is Michigan really a better job than UCLA?  Maybe Michigan pays more, there is more interest, and the culture is more demanding for a winner, but from a recruiting standpoint, it's tough to argue Michigan is better.

Big Ten is probably easier than the Pac-12.

Peak UCLA is below peak SC; peak Michigan is equal to peak OSU and better than peak #3 Big Ten.

Recruiting is definitely better in Michignan than UCLA, at least if you go by recruiting rankings; Hoke has always trounced Mora.

And, of course, money. It always surprises me that people downplay this in sports circles when they would rarely casually disregard it in "real life," if you will.