11-06-2014, 08:27 AM
As others have said, I think it would be far more constructive to express our wishes than our suggestions. Anybody who thinks that Shaw and/or Bloomgren are going to seriously "listen" to what we say is smoking their own exhaust. Also, many of these suggestions have been unseemly, given that few if any of us has adequately knowledge of what is actually happening at the coal face vis a vis our offense. So, when I wish upon a star...
...I wish for an offense that encourages flair as much as execution
...I wish for an offensive coordinator and/or head coach who is/are risk intrigued rather than risk averse
...I wish for redshirts to be burned in much larger numbers and more frequently (why is a 5-year career the new normal?)
...I wish for a staff that embraces change rather than fights to retain/retrain the past
...I wish for a team that sees the red zone as a green light for creativity rather than an excuse to run powerjumboogre again and again and again
...I wish that Stanford football would be fun (even if occasionally completely wacko) rather than dull as dishwater, as it is now...
End of rant.
...I wish for an offense that encourages flair as much as execution
...I wish for an offensive coordinator and/or head coach who is/are risk intrigued rather than risk averse
...I wish for redshirts to be burned in much larger numbers and more frequently (why is a 5-year career the new normal?)
...I wish for a staff that embraces change rather than fights to retain/retrain the past
...I wish for a team that sees the red zone as a green light for creativity rather than an excuse to run powerjumboogre again and again and again
...I wish that Stanford football would be fun (even if occasionally completely wacko) rather than dull as dishwater, as it is now...
End of rant.
All models are wrong; some models are useful......
George Box