This isn't in hindsight

Hello There, Guest! Welcome to The CardBoard!

Feel free to Register and discuss on various topics with likeminded people. Already have an account? Please Login!

Thread Rating:

0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
1
2
3
4
5

This isn't in hindsight

washingtonismoney
Supreme Court Justice

Posts: 12,767
Threads: 1,966
Joined: Dec 1969

#7

10-29-2014, 10:02 AM

(10-29-2014, 09:58 AM)Redrum link Wrote:What it boils down to is we are not winning like we used to and the hunt for the guilty is on.

I dunno, lots of people were on open season preemptively over the years. Not that that matters for this particular discussion, just an observation.

Anyway, I'm not sure the Innovator's Dilemma is the best cite here for someone advocating David Shaw adjustments. One persuasive reading of that book is that old institutions cannot change; they are replaced.

#7

washingtonismoney

10-29-2014, 10:02 AM

(10-29-2014, 09:58 AM)Redrum link Wrote:What it boils down to is we are not winning like we used to and the hunt for the guilty is on.

I dunno, lots of people were on open season preemptively over the years. Not that that matters for this particular discussion, just an observation.

Anyway, I'm not sure the Innovator's Dilemma is the best cite here for someone advocating David Shaw adjustments. One persuasive reading of that book is that old institutions cannot change; they are replaced.

Find

Reply

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

This isn't in hindsight - by OutsiderFan - 10-29-2014, 05:39 AM

Re: This isn't in hindsight - by washingtonismoney - 10-29-2014, 07:26 AM

Re: This isn't in hindsight - by OutsiderFan - 10-29-2014, 07:51 AM

Re: This isn't in hindsight - by stupac2 - 10-29-2014, 08:40 AM

Re: This isn't in hindsight - by CTcard - 10-29-2014, 09:17 AM

If one thinks Shaw is stuck /immovable on change... - by Redrum - 10-29-2014, 09:58 AM

Re: If one thinks Shaw is stuck /immovable on change... - by washingtonismoney - 10-29-2014, 10:02 AM

Re: If one thinks Shaw is stuck /immovable on change... - by Stymie - 10-29-2014, 10:21 AM

Re: If one thinks Shaw is stuck /immovable on change... - by Boston Card - 10-29-2014, 11:45 AM

Re: This isn't in hindsight - by Papa John - 10-29-2014, 12:04 PM

Re: This isn't in hindsight - by OutsiderFan - 10-29-2014, 12:34 PM

Re: This isn't in hindsight - by stupac2 - 10-29-2014, 12:50 PM

Re: This isn't in hindsight - by CTcard - 10-29-2014, 01:00 PM

Re: This isn't in hindsight - by Boston Card - 10-29-2014, 01:04 PM

Re: This isn't in hindsight - by washingtonismoney - 10-29-2014, 01:43 PM

Re: This isn't in hindsight - by jaymon - 10-29-2014, 01:50 PM

Re: This isn't in hindsight - by CrazedZooChimp - 10-29-2014, 02:35 PM

Re: This isn't in hindsight - by washingtonismoney - 10-29-2014, 02:37 PM

Re: This isn't in hindsight - by Cardinal96 - 10-29-2014, 02:42 PM

Re: This isn't in hindsight - by washingtonismoney - 10-29-2014, 02:44 PM

Re: This isn't in hindsight - by Boston Card - 10-29-2014, 02:53 PM

Re: This isn't in hindsight - by washingtonismoney - 10-29-2014, 03:05 PM

Re: This isn't in hindsight - by yvonne - 10-29-2014, 06:45 PM

Re: This isn't in hindsight - by CTcard - 10-30-2014, 06:53 AM

We're missing two major issues here - by Mick - 10-30-2014, 08:59 AM

Re: This isn't in hindsight - by Boston Card - 10-30-2014, 10:48 AM

Re: This isn't in hindsight - by jayasena - 10-30-2014, 01:30 PM

View a Printable Version