08-28-2014, 12:29 PM
9-3 is a really optimistic worst-case scenario. Stanford hasn't been juggernaughty since 2011 and has, more often than not, come out on top in some really tight games these past two years. What makes this year so different in terms of skill, schedule, depth, and/or intangibles? (Answer: the schedule is actually tougher.) Stanford will probably have another Utah game (or two, like say the Utes and/or Beavers) and isn't it pretty conceivable they could drop any number of games against:
USC
at Washington
at Notre Dame
at Arizona State
at UCLA
Realistic worst case is probably 6-6 if things go badly, and all positions are not equally deep.
I think there are at least three auto-wins (UC Davis, Army, and Cal), but man, you never, never know. At least we'll have replay this year, right? :P
USC
at Washington
at Notre Dame
at Arizona State
at UCLA
Realistic worst case is probably 6-6 if things go badly, and all positions are not equally deep.
I think there are at least three auto-wins (UC Davis, Army, and Cal), but man, you never, never know. At least we'll have replay this year, right? :P
Yeah, I just stare at my desk, but it looks like I'm working .I'd say in a given week I probably only do about fifteen minutes of real, actual, work. Peter Gibbons
