[Rally]

[quote author=OutsiderFan link=topic=7902.msg92718#msg92718 date=1405991843]
Cameron Scarlett names Top 5 on Twitter today:  ND, Stanford, UCLA, UO, UW

Thankfully no Stanford fans @ replied to him.  Can't say the same for ND, UCLA, and UW.

It seems Stanford is in good shape with him, and man is RB a need position, especially one who is or will be north of 210 lbs.  What makes Scarlett unique is that he is more of a receiver who plays some RB than a RB who can catch.

I've always wondered about that. Does a non-booster fan have the same NCAA restriction over social media as those who can be classified as boosters? It seems that every other schools' fans tweet @ their prospects but Stanford fans tend to "like" a post and generally do not tweet at the prospects. I know the Stanford Compliance twitter regularly tweets out a message reminding Stanford fans to let the coaches do the recruiting, but is it a violation to engage on social media if you are not a booster?
[/quote]

Maybe its just down right rude, counter-productive, and mean to harass a young man you don't know on social media.  Maybe even creepy.  If you're 17, go for it.  If 27+, just smile and let it go, man.

[Rally]

[quote author=OutsiderFan link=topic=7902.msg92718#msg92718 date=1405991843]
Cameron Scarlett names Top 5 on Twitter today:  ND, Stanford, UCLA, UO, UW

Thankfully no Stanford fans @ replied to him.  Can't say the same for ND, UCLA, and UW.

It seems Stanford is in good shape with him, and man is RB a need position, especially one who is or will be north of 210 lbs.  What makes Scarlett unique is that he is more of a receiver who plays some RB than a RB who can catch.

I've always wondered about that. Does a non-booster fan have the same NCAA restriction over social media as those who can be classified as boosters? It seems that every other schools' fans tweet @ their prospects but Stanford fans tend to "like" a post and generally do not tweet at the prospects. I know the Stanford Compliance twitter regularly tweets out a message reminding Stanford fans to let the coaches do the recruiting, but is it a violation to engage on social media if you are not a booster?
[/quote]

Maybe its just down right rude, counter-productive, and mean to harass a young man you don't know on social media.  Maybe even creepy.  If you're 17, go for it.  If 27+, just smile and let it go, man.