01-08-2014, 05:31 AM
I don't remember reading if Lee submitted an application or not, but if guys who once were considering Stanford no longer mention Stanford at this time of the year it seems safe to assume they were an admissions casualty.Â
So is it also safe to assume the class will be at most 21, if all visitors are admitted and committed? Or are there other possibilities not visiting this weekend?
Alexander, Schultz, Thomas, and C. Tucker seem to have no plan B behind them, and Burkett would be important for OL depth. My order of importance:
1. Thomas (must have great DL play to have great defense)
2. Alexander (see Rose Bowl for importance of great athletes at CB)
3. C. Tucker (highest rated OL prospect in two years, will need Peat replacement in 2015 IMO)
4. Schultz (would be great to have, but with three young TEs, not a back breaker without him)
5. Burkett (don't know much about, but doesn't seem as elite/unique for Stanford as others)
So is it also safe to assume the class will be at most 21, if all visitors are admitted and committed? Or are there other possibilities not visiting this weekend?
Alexander, Schultz, Thomas, and C. Tucker seem to have no plan B behind them, and Burkett would be important for OL depth. My order of importance:
1. Thomas (must have great DL play to have great defense)
2. Alexander (see Rose Bowl for importance of great athletes at CB)
3. C. Tucker (highest rated OL prospect in two years, will need Peat replacement in 2015 IMO)
4. Schultz (would be great to have, but with three young TEs, not a back breaker without him)
5. Burkett (don't know much about, but doesn't seem as elite/unique for Stanford as others)