[Gauss]

Yeah, I agree with the others that top 5, even top 10 is too much, unless we get one or two pleasant surprises on D. The offense, on the other hand, should improve some.

[quote author=FarmBoy link=topic=9357.msg80979#msg80979 date=1389116454]

a Kal-endorsed 'roid path.

Care to elaborate?

I think he meant "Kal insinuated." Basically, a bunch of fans on the 59er Insider have insinuated that Stanford's success has come because the players are using performance-enhancing drugs. This insinuation is based on um, um, we're winning? and maybe the fact that players are much more developed as

Interestingly, Stanford's players are injured far less frequently than those of any other team, and injury often correlates with PED use. http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/p...2009-02-20
[/quote]

Thank you Yvonne. At first I thought he was throwing around the same baseless accusations UCB's do, but your explanation makes more sense.

[Gauss]

Yeah, I agree with the others that top 5, even top 10 is too much, unless we get one or two pleasant surprises on D. The offense, on the other hand, should improve some.

[quote author=FarmBoy link=topic=9357.msg80979#msg80979 date=1389116454]

a Kal-endorsed 'roid path.

Care to elaborate?

I think he meant "Kal insinuated." Basically, a bunch of fans on the 59er Insider have insinuated that Stanford's success has come because the players are using performance-enhancing drugs. This insinuation is based on um, um, we're winning? and maybe the fact that players are much more developed as

Interestingly, Stanford's players are injured far less frequently than those of any other team, and injury often correlates with PED use. http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/p...2009-02-20
[/quote]

Thank you Yvonne. At first I thought he was throwing around the same baseless accusations UCB's do, but your explanation makes more sense.