[stupac2]

Bingo.  And I wouldn't consider the Stanford QB a "mobile" one.  He's simply opportunistic and has good pocket awareness.  My original argument, which happens to be backed up with overwhelming evidence, is that QBs of the RG3/Tebow variety are more of a liability than an asset.  This is due to longevity issues, as well as the ability of good defenses to neutralize the running threat (see MSU v. Braxton Miller, LSU v. Oregon, Stanford v. Oregon, etc.).

Lumping Tebow in with RG3 isn't really fair, since Tebow isn't just a bad passer, he's a horrendous passer. RG3 is actually pretty good when he's healthy, and I'm not sure that Tom Brady would look good behind that OL.

Anyway, any definition of "mobile QB" that doesn't include Hogan is asinine and useless. He's a mobile quarterback.

[stupac2]

Bingo.  And I wouldn't consider the Stanford QB a "mobile" one.  He's simply opportunistic and has good pocket awareness.  My original argument, which happens to be backed up with overwhelming evidence, is that QBs of the RG3/Tebow variety are more of a liability than an asset.  This is due to longevity issues, as well as the ability of good defenses to neutralize the running threat (see MSU v. Braxton Miller, LSU v. Oregon, Stanford v. Oregon, etc.).

Lumping Tebow in with RG3 isn't really fair, since Tebow isn't just a bad passer, he's a horrendous passer. RG3 is actually pretty good when he's healthy, and I'm not sure that Tom Brady would look good behind that OL.

Anyway, any definition of "mobile QB" that doesn't include Hogan is asinine and useless. He's a mobile quarterback.