12-13-2013, 12:37 AM
I used the construct that 99.9% of people wouldn't be able to get it. I could just be way over analyzing, and looking for a pattern that isn't really there... here goes.
I drop the last digit of each number, and multiply the remaining digit by N. That number is added to the series N*5.
3=18Â (3*1) + (3*5) = 18
4=32Â (4*3) + (4*5) = 32
5=50Â (5*5) + (5*5) = 50
6=72Â (6*7) + (5*6) = 72
7=98Â (7*9) + (5*7) = 98
8=168 (8*16) + (5*8) = 168
9=369 (9*36) + (9*5) = 369
Like I said, I was purposefully looking for something that might not even actually be there.
I drop the last digit of each number, and multiply the remaining digit by N. That number is added to the series N*5.
3=18Â (3*1) + (3*5) = 18
4=32Â (4*3) + (4*5) = 32
5=50Â (5*5) + (5*5) = 50
6=72Â (6*7) + (5*6) = 72
7=98Â (7*9) + (5*7) = 98
8=168 (8*16) + (5*8) = 168
9=369 (9*36) + (9*5) = 369
Like I said, I was purposefully looking for something that might not even actually be there.