05-22-2026, 09:10 PM
Last month, a large NYC law firm (nearly 1,000 lawyers) filed a major motion in a high profile case that required forty corrections for AI-related errors; hallucinations,
Irony of ironies, this firm advises OpenAI on safe and ethical deployment of artificial intelligence. Second irony: the partner who had to write the apology/please-don't-sanction-us-for-all-time letter also represented Silicon Valley Bank as debtor.
Just for fun, a database cataloging nearly 1,500 AI-related errors in litigation: AI Hallucination Cases Database – Damien Charlotin
Last item: I am publishing my third book next spring, and this was the first time that the publisher not only asked for my AI use for any part of the book (none at all) but also used AI tools to check the manuscript. My editor told me it was for two reasons, both fairly obvious: plagiarism and the fact that AI writing just isn't that good, at least not yet.
Irony of ironies, this firm advises OpenAI on safe and ethical deployment of artificial intelligence. Second irony: the partner who had to write the apology/please-don't-sanction-us-for-all-time letter also represented Silicon Valley Bank as debtor.
Just for fun, a database cataloging nearly 1,500 AI-related errors in litigation: AI Hallucination Cases Database – Damien Charlotin
Last item: I am publishing my third book next spring, and this was the first time that the publisher not only asked for my AI use for any part of the book (none at all) but also used AI tools to check the manuscript. My editor told me it was for two reasons, both fairly obvious: plagiarism and the fact that AI writing just isn't that good, at least not yet.
Audaces fortuna iuvat