11-09-2025, 12:03 PM
(11-09-2025, 11:15 AM)jacket3ree Wrote: I'll read Matt's post-mortem but I can save him a few thousand words. Stanford is not good.I disagree. Stanford is not just "not good". Stanford is bad. There is no way to sugar coat it. Of course that doesn't mean every Stanford player is bad. However, a lot of them are, particularly on the offensive line. There is simply no way to scheme around an OL as bad as ours. We lack talent in other areas as well, and that does limit our upside, but IMO the OL problems dwarf the other problems.