09-08-2025, 03:46 PM
(09-08-2025, 03:10 PM)BostonCard Wrote:(09-08-2025, 01:36 PM)Ratmandoo Wrote: And frankly, I would take Kevin Hogan over Steve Stenstrom any day of the week. Sure, Stenstrom was the more accurate passer but Hogan was a better college QB.
Steve Stenstrom’s career completion percentage was 63.1%. That’s very good, but it doesn’t make him more accurate than Hogan, who had a career completion percentage of 65.9%. Hogan also had a better yards per attempt (8.5) than Stenstrom (7.8), and a marginally lower interception rate (2.6% compared to Stenstrom’s 2.7%).
To be fair, they competed in different eras, but I just don’t think it is accurate to say that Stenstrom is the more accurate quarterback, at least by standard metrics of accuracy.
Hogan continues to be the most underrated quarterback in Stanford history.
BC
I'm right there with you, BC. Hogan is the winningest QB in Stanford history. We saw him win games with his arm. We saw him win games with his legs. We saw him win games with his poise. Isn't that enough for folks?
"We have an unwritten rule around here not to do anything stupid."
-Casey Jacobsen, Feb 3, 2000
