03-01-2025, 11:09 PM
(03-01-2025, 07:07 PM)M T Wrote: In the first game, Stanford had the tying run on 3rd but no go.
Can’t Stanford afford a second camera??? The batter is tiny; the ball is practically a pixel. No prayer of seeing what happened on a close play. I feel like my nose is going to bleed. Where are my binoculars?
Clearly someone is controlling the camera. With a 2nd came focused on pitcher to umpire, the operator only needs to switch to the wide view when the ball is hit. The camera on the battery probably wouldn’t show the annoying netting
Second your question. In the past there were three cameras. But that adds a producer controlling the feeds to the output channel. No idea why we’re down to one. Re the net, I await the ai solution.
