(11-18-2024, 12:08 AM)M T Wrote:Yes, apparently. The whole second half of the article was deleted. Here is a link to another one, but it is unclear if this "permission" really is in place.(11-17-2024, 02:51 PM)Goose Wrote: This is a bit of a different story: https://kyivindependent.com/uk-france-ap...o-reports/
This is a direct result of the US allowing these items that use US technology to be used in this manner. These missiles have a 340 mile range, compared to the ATACMS 190 mile range. They carry a 990 lb warhead compared to the ATACMS 500 lb warhead. Of course ATACMS is a ballistic missile while Storm Shadow is a cruise missile. Cruise missiles are lots easier to shoot down. Ukraine has many more Storm Shadows than they do ATACMS. The Storm Shadow being air launched can be carried closer to the target before launch. These missiles will probably make more of a difference.
Uh, did that article get updated (5 hours after publication) to drop mention of Storm Shadow and only mention ATACMS?
https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2024/11/17/7484978/
The above is obviously a pro-Ukrainian source. A more neutral one is below, but is that the product of an echo chamber?
https://defence-industry.eu/france-and-b...st-russia/
This one certainly is.
https://mil.in.ua/en/news/france-uk-appr...e_vignette
The BBC article below was perhaps the "state of play" at the time. It is a bit "old". It seems to indicate the permission is either already in place or soon to be so. It may not be yet "official", and until it is we can't be sure.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c5yxl7g7l22o
UPDATE: An additional data point. https://euromaidanpress.com/2024/11/17/z...rm-shadow/ Still unclear what is true.
