04-30-2024, 10:12 PM
(This post was last modified: 04-30-2024, 10:13 PM by BillBradley.)
(04-29-2024, 11:34 PM)Baez87 Wrote: Bill Bradley:OK thanks. I don't mean to derail your topic (others with law backgrounds please continue to keep the thread going). But FWIW, when Brittany Griner or Stewy or Caitlin or Juju brought their talents to the schools they chose as freshmen, why wasn't that in itself a display of an inordinate amount of power? It happens again and again, every recruiting cycle. The top players change the landscape when they enter as freshmen. Also, I know I sound like a broken record, but in all those cases I think the institutions were all glad to serve those athletes. They benefited greatly.
No, my point is that empowering the players to shape the terrain of college basketball places an inordinate amount of power in the player’s hands. I would favor a system that is shaped by the stakeholders of the game. That would include those who want to see athletics serve the institution rather than the reverse. However, in this post, I am simply asking others to join in to suggest legal ways that the current policy could be altered. You have asserted in the past that we should accept the current policy because that’s the way it is. I think that policies are worked out over time. We are in a very early stage of the modifications of collegiate athletics.
I
