[cardcrimson]

The team's record so far seems pretty surprising. What conclusions can we draw? Too early?

We're missing our top 4 players (aka more than half of our starting lineup) for the season for the Olympics. Going to be tough to be at the same level with that handicap.

Read on another site that we're missing 5 (that's 83% of our starting field players). UCLA and USC two each. Cal, perhaps one.

Lots of good polo played at non big four schools on both the men's and women's sides, too. Finally some parity, but tough this year for Stanford.

[cardcrimson]

The team's record so far seems pretty surprising. What conclusions can we draw? Too early?

We're missing our top 4 players (aka more than half of our starting lineup) for the season for the Olympics. Going to be tough to be at the same level with that handicap.

Read on another site that we're missing 5 (that's 83% of our starting field players). UCLA and USC two each. Cal, perhaps one.

Lots of good polo played at non big four schools on both the men's and women's sides, too. Finally some parity, but tough this year for Stanford.