01-17-2023, 06:41 PM
[tweet]https://twitter.com/KyivIndependent/status/1615442283985248256?s=20&t=PqNXVETE4kp6qWkAxvmd6g[/tweet]
On tanks...
[tweet]https://twitter.com/MarkHertling/status/1611768817805414403?s=20&t=PqNXVETE4kp6qWkAxvmd6g[/tweet]
From a guy who would know.
Also, this analysis from Shoshank Joshi in the Economist.
https://www.economist.com/interactive/in...e-a-future
BC
On tanks...
[tweet]https://twitter.com/MarkHertling/status/1611768817805414403?s=20&t=PqNXVETE4kp6qWkAxvmd6g[/tweet]
From a guy who would know.
Also, this analysis from Shoshank Joshi in the Economist.
https://www.economist.com/interactive/in...e-a-future
Quote:It would be wrong, however, to write the tank’s obituary based on its performance in the war, precisely because Russia has made such poor use of them. Many military experts had expected that drones would be little more than a nuisance in any conflict. But Russia’s failure to eliminate Ukrainian air defences in the first days of the war means that its warplanes cannot patrol the skies, giving tb2s more freedom to operate. Meanwhile, Russian air defences, designed to detect larger aircraft, seem to struggle with the smaller drones, though there have been improvements in recent weeks.
Modern armed forces prize the idea of combined-arms warfare, in which the various elements of a military formation compensate for each other’s weaknesses. Tanks can clear the way for infantry, but only infantry can go into a warren of tunnels to weed out enemy squads armed with anti-tank weapons. Warplanes can provide cover for advancing tanks and infantry, but need air defences on the ground to keep enemy planes away. Ben Barry, a former commander of a British armoured infantry battalion, now at the iiss, a think-tank, has called it “a lethal version of scissors, paper, stone”.
BC
