The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this

Hello There, Guest! Welcome to The CardBoard!

Feel free to Register and discuss on various topics with likeminded people. Already have an account? Please Login!

Thread Rating:

2 Vote(s) - 1 Average
1
2
3
4
5

The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this

82lsju
I may be small, but I'm slow too

Posts: 6,193
Threads: 831
Joined: Dec 1969

#48

12-22-2022, 09:45 AM

work on IT words to use/not use has been going on for at least a couple of years, this from APril 2021

Quote:‘Master,’ ‘Slave’ and the Fight Over Offensive Terms in Computing

Nearly a year after the Internet Engineering Task Force took up a plan to replace words that could be considered racist, the debate is still raging.

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/13/techn...-ietf.html

Eric

"the older we get the better we were"

#48

82lsju

12-22-2022, 09:45 AM

work on IT words to use/not use has been going on for at least a couple of years, this from APril 2021

Quote:‘Master,’ ‘Slave’ and the Fight Over Offensive Terms in Computing

Nearly a year after the Internet Engineering Task Force took up a plan to replace words that could be considered racist, the debate is still raging.

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/13/techn...-ietf.html

Eric

"the older we get the better we were"

Find

Reply

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by gailtate - 12-20-2022, 09:01 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by winflop - 12-20-2022, 09:14 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Mick - 12-20-2022, 12:23 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by winflop - 12-20-2022, 06:53 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Mick - 12-20-2022, 09:55 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by martyup - 12-20-2022, 10:29 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Bampa - 12-20-2022, 10:43 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by SamuelMcF - 12-20-2022, 10:47 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by martyup - 12-20-2022, 11:08 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Bampa - 12-20-2022, 11:11 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by JohnR34231 - 12-20-2022, 10:59 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Beeg_Dawg - 12-20-2022, 11:04 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by BostonCard - 12-20-2022, 11:24 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by McKenwood - 12-20-2022, 11:34 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by murky - 12-20-2022, 05:05 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by BostonCard - 12-20-2022, 09:16 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by M T - 12-20-2022, 12:08 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by BostonCard - 12-20-2022, 01:25 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by lex24 - 01-07-2023, 09:59 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Snorlax94 - 12-20-2022, 01:56 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by cardcrimson - 12-20-2022, 02:15 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by dabigv13 - 12-20-2022, 02:25 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by cardcrimson - 12-20-2022, 02:33 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by dabigv13 - 12-20-2022, 03:18 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by CompSci87 - 12-20-2022, 03:33 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by BostonCard - 12-20-2022, 03:45 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by qwerty49 - 12-20-2022, 02:35 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by CTcard - 12-20-2022, 09:45 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by BostonCard - 12-20-2022, 10:01 PM

MVCard - by MVCard - 12-20-2022, 02:36 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by dabigv13 - 12-20-2022, 03:43 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Phogge - 12-20-2022, 05:05 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Leftcoast - 12-20-2022, 07:09 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by 82lsju - 12-21-2022, 08:19 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by winflop - 12-21-2022, 08:53 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Mick - 12-21-2022, 10:46 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by CTcard - 12-21-2022, 10:07 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Phogge - 12-21-2022, 01:19 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by BostonCard - 12-21-2022, 05:29 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by terry - 12-21-2022, 06:27 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by cardcrimson - 12-21-2022, 07:27 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Madera86 - 12-21-2022, 10:11 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Leftcoast - 12-21-2022, 10:42 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by M T - 12-21-2022, 08:51 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by BostonCard - 12-22-2022, 08:56 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Mick - 12-22-2022, 07:09 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by dabigv13 - 12-22-2022, 07:31 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by 2006alum - 12-22-2022, 07:38 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by 82lsju - 12-22-2022, 09:45 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by 81alum - 12-23-2022, 11:13 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by murky - 12-23-2022, 02:07 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Phogge - 12-23-2022, 03:06 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Canalejas - 12-23-2022, 03:40 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by TreesAndBirds - 01-07-2023, 10:07 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by winflop - 01-13-2023, 08:30 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by lex24 - 01-07-2023, 10:42 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Goose - 01-07-2023, 11:34 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by BostonCard - 01-12-2023, 06:24 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by M T - 01-13-2023, 02:17 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by 2006alum - 01-17-2023, 05:31 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by lex24 - 01-17-2023, 08:10 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Mick - 01-27-2023, 06:23 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Phogge - 01-12-2023, 06:32 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by martyup - 01-13-2023, 09:34 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by BostonCard - 01-13-2023, 02:45 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by cardcrimson - 01-13-2023, 02:51 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by lex24 - 01-13-2023, 08:35 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by martyup - 01-13-2023, 10:00 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by BostonCard - 01-16-2023, 04:07 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by jacket3ree - 01-16-2023, 06:22 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by BostonCard - 01-26-2023, 10:08 PM

View a Printable Version