[dabigv13]

https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospa...022-11-28/

These would be slick. Not quite as long range as ATACMS but at ~94 miles about twice as far as the GMLRS rounds which they have now, with a slightly smaller warhead. Capable of being fired from HIMARS and M270 launchers.

...at all those tempting Russian targets inside of Russia...

There are good targets in Russia in range of GMLRS that Ukraine has already and AFAIK they have not once used them on any targets in Russia. So I think Ukraine would adhere to any red lines the US places on the use of these or other long range weapons such as ATACMS or extended range GMLRS that is currently being trialed.

[dabigv13]

https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospa...022-11-28/

These would be slick. Not quite as long range as ATACMS but at ~94 miles about twice as far as the GMLRS rounds which they have now, with a slightly smaller warhead. Capable of being fired from HIMARS and M270 launchers.

...at all those tempting Russian targets inside of Russia...

There are good targets in Russia in range of GMLRS that Ukraine has already and AFAIK they have not once used them on any targets in Russia. So I think Ukraine would adhere to any red lines the US places on the use of these or other long range weapons such as ATACMS or extended range GMLRS that is currently being trialed.